Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0283714.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283714. eCollection 2023.

Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review

Affiliations

Validated assessment tools for screen media use: A systematic review

Oriana Perez et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: Accurate measurement of adult and child screen media use are needed to robustly assess its impact on health outcomes. Our objective was to systematically review screen media use measurement tools that have been validated against an objective "gold standard" tool.

Methods: The search strategy was initially conducted in Medline Ovid and translated to Embase, Web of Science, PsychInfo and Cochrane. A modified natural language search was conducted in Google Scholar and IEEE. The initial search was conducted in March 2021, and an updated search was conducted in June 2022. Additional studies were included from the references. Studies had to describe the validation of a tool to measure screen media use on participants of any age against a 'gold standard' or comparable objective measure. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) was used to assess the criterion validity. Four authors reviewed the titles in two rounds and extracted data.

Results: Twenty-nine articles were included in the review. Studies measured TV, computer, mobile device and social media site screen media use through: self or parent report, direct or video observation, computer and mobile device use tracking programs, and through other novel devices such as wearable devices and cameras. Correlations of self or parent report of screen media with the gold standard were lower than correlations of technology-based measures, and video observation with the gold standard. The COSMIN criterion validity ratings ranged from poor to excellent; most of the studies received a global score of fair or poor.

Conclusions: Technology based validated tools that more directly measure screen use are emerging that have been validated against a gold standard for measuring screen use. However, practical, objective measures of diverse types of screen media use that have been tested on diverse populations are needed to better understand the impact of screen media use on the development and physical and mental health of children and adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flow diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rizzuto TE. Age and technology innovation in the workplace: Does work context matter? Comput Human Behav. 2011;27(5):1612–20. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2011.01.011 - DOI
    1. Harvey DL, Milton K, Jones AP, Atkin AJ. International trends in screen-based behaviours from 2012 to 2019. Prev Med. 2022;154:106909. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106909 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rideout V, Robb MB. The Common Sense Census: Media Use by Kids Age Zero to Eight. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media; 2020.
    1. Rideout V, Peebles A, Mann S, Robb MB. Common Sense Census: Media Use by Tweens and Teens, 2021. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media; 2022.
    1. Trinh MH, Sundaram R, Robinson SL, Lin TC, Bell EM, Ghassabian A, et al.. Association of trajectory and covariates of children’s screen media time. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(1):71–8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2019.4488 . - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types