Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 13;18(4):e0278007.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278007. eCollection 2023.

Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: A systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Affiliations

Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: A systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Paul Dunbar et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: The delivery of high quality care is a fundamental goal for health systems worldwide. One policy tool to ensure quality is the regulation of services by an independent public authority. This systematic review seeks to identify determinants of compliance with such regulation in health and social care services.

Methods: Searches were carried out on five electronic databases and grey literature sources. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies were eligible for inclusion. Titles and abstracts were screened by two reviewers independently. Determinants were identified from the included studies, extracted and allocated to constructs in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The quality of included studies was appraised by two reviewers independently. The results were synthesised in a narrative review using the constructs of the CFIR as grouping themes.

Results: The search yielded 7,500 articles for screening, of which 157 were included. Most studies were quantitative designs in nursing home settings and were conducted in the United States. Determinants were largely structural in nature and allocated most frequently to the inner and outer setting domains of the CFIR. The following structural characteristics and compliance were found to be positively associated: smaller facilities (measured by bed capacity); higher nurse-staffing levels; and lower staff turnover. A facility's geographic location and compliance was also associated. It was difficult to make findings in respect of process determinants as qualitative studies were sparse, limiting investigation of the processes underlying regulatory compliance.

Conclusion: The literature in this field has focused to date on structural attributes of compliant providers, perhaps because these are easier to measure, and has neglected more complex processes around the implementation of regulatory standards. A number of gaps, particularly in terms of qualitative work, are evident in the literature and further research in this area is needed to provide a clearer picture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PD and LMK are currently employed by the Health Information and Quality Authority, which is the regulatory authority for health and social care in Ireland. However, this does not present any conflict of interest for this review.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram: Determinants of regulatory compliance in health and social care services: A systematic review using the consolidated framework for implementation research.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hickey EC, Young GJ, Parker VA, Czarnowski EJ, Saliba D, Berlowitz DR. The effects of changes in nursing home staffing on pressure ulcer rates. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2005; 6(1): 50–3. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861004000040. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2004.12.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kovach CR, Taneli Y, Neiman T, Dyer EM, Arzaga AJA, Kelber ST. Evaluation of an ultraviolet room disinfection protocol to decrease nursing home microbial burden, infection and hospitalization rates. BMC infectious diseases. 2017; 17(1): 1–8. Available from: https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-017-2275-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pearse RM, Moreno RP, Bauer P, Pelosi P, Metnitz P, Spies C, et al.. Mortality after surgery in Europe: a 7 day cohort study. The Lancet. 2012; 380(9847): 1059–65. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140673612611489. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61148-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mukamel DB, Haeder SF, Weimer DL. Top-down and bottom-up approaches to health care quality: the impacts of regulation and report cards. Annual review of public health. 2014; 35: 477–97. Available from: https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-082313.... - PubMed
    1. Selznick P. Focusing organisational research on regulation. In: Noll Roger G., (Ed). Regulatory policy and the social sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1985. p. 363–8.

Publication types