Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study
- PMID: 37053233
- PMCID: PMC10101493
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283815
Considerations in implementation of social risk factor screening and referral in maternal and infant care in Washington, DC: A qualitative study
Abstract
Background: The District of Columbia (DC) has striking disparities in maternal and infant outcomes comparing Black to White women and babies. Social determinants of health (SDoH) are widely recognized as a significant contributor to these disparities in health outcomes. Screening for social risk factors and referral for appropriate services is a critical step in addressing social needs and reducing outcome disparities.
Methods: We conducted interviews among employees (n = 18) and patients (n = 9) across three diverse, urban clinics within a healthcare system and one community-based organization involved in a five-year initiative to reduce maternal and infant disparities in DC. Interviews were guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to understand current processes and organizational factors that contributed to or impeded delivery of social risk factor screening and referral for indicated needs.
Results: We found that current processes for social risk factor screening and referral differed between and within clinics depending on the patient population. Key facilitators of successful screening included a supportive organizational culture and adaptability of more patient-centered screening processes. Key barriers to delivery included high patient volume and limited electronic health record capabilities to record results and track the status of internal and community referrals. Areas identified for improvement included additional social risk factor assessment training for new providers, patient-centered approaches to screening, improved tracking processes, and facilitation of connections to social services within clinical settings.
Conclusion: Despite proliferation of social risk factor screeners and recognition of their importance within health care settings, few studies detail implementation processes for social risk factor screening and referrals. Future studies should test implementation strategies for screening and referral services to address identified barriers to implementation.
Copyright: © 2023 Brown et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Provider and Staff Perspectives on Screening and Referral for Social Determinants of Health During Perinatal Care: Implications Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.Womens Health Issues. 2025 Mar-Apr;35(2):116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2025.01.007. Epub 2025 Feb 27. Womens Health Issues. 2025. PMID: 40021422
-
Social needs screening and referral in pediatric primary care clinics: a multiple case study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Nov 17;22(1):1369. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08692-x. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022. PMID: 36397075 Free PMC article.
-
Provider and Staff Feedback on Screening for Social and Behavioral Determinants of Health for Pediatric Patients.J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun;32(3):297-306. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180276. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019. PMID: 31068394
-
Screening and Referral Care Delivery Services and Unmet Health-Related Social Needs: A Systematic Review.Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 Aug 12;18:E78. doi: 10.5888/pcd18.200569. Prev Chronic Dis. 2021. PMID: 34387188 Free PMC article.
-
Reduction of maternal and perinatal mortality in rural and peri-urban settings: what works?Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996 Oct;69(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/0301-2115(95)02535-9. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996. PMID: 8909956 Review.
Cited by
-
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40110911
-
WIC staff and healthcare professional perceptions of an EHR intervention to facilitate referrals to and improve communication and coordination with WIC: A qualitative study.J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Feb 26;8(1):e47. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.488. eCollection 2024. J Clin Transl Sci. 2024. PMID: 38510692 Free PMC article.
-
Learning in real world practice: Identifying implementation strategies to integrate health-related social needs screening within a large health system.J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Oct 16;7(1):e229. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.652. eCollection 2023. J Clin Transl Sci. 2023. PMID: 38028350 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' perspectives about sharing information with providers on social needs during pregnancy: a qualitative study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 21;25(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12666-0. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025. PMID: 40399928 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical