Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 13;23(1):122.
doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02072-6.

A bedside swallowing screen for the identification of post-extubation dysphagia on the intensive care unit - validation of the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS)-ICU

Affiliations

A bedside swallowing screen for the identification of post-extubation dysphagia on the intensive care unit - validation of the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS)-ICU

Claudia Troll et al. BMC Anesthesiol. .

Abstract

Purpose: Screening for dysphagia at the intensive care unit (ICU) soon after extubation can prevent aspiration, pneumonia, lower mortality, and shorten re-feeding interval. This study aimed to modify the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS), which was developed for acute stroke patients, and to validate it for extubated patients in the ICU.

Methods: In this prospective study, forty-five patients who had been intubated for at least 24 h were recruited consecutively at the earliest 24 h after extubation. The modified GUSS-ICU was performed twice by two speech and language therapists independently. Concurrently, gold standard the flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was performed by an otorhinolaryngologist. Measurements were conducted within a three-hour period; all testers were blinded to each other's results.

Results: According to FEES, 36 of 45 (80%) participants were diagnosed with dysphagia; 13 of those were severe, 12 moderate, and 11 mild. Compared to FEES, the GUSS-ICU predicted dysphagia well (area under the curve for the initial rater pair: 0.923, 95% CI 0.832-1.000 and 0.923, 95% CI 0.836 -1.000 for the second rater pair). The sensitivity was 91.7% (95% CI 77.5-98.3%) and 94.4% (95% CI 81.3-99.3%); the specificity was 88.9% (51.8-99.7%) and 66.7% (29.9-92.5%); the positive predictive values were 97.1% (83.8-99.5%) and 91.9% (81.7-96.6%), and the negative predictive values were 72.7% (46.8-89%) and 75% (41.9-92.6%) for the first and second rater pairs, respectively. Dysphagia severity classification according to FEES and GUSS-ICU correlated strongly (Spearman's rho: 0.61 for rater 1 and 0.60 for rater 2, p < 0.001). Agreement by all testers was good (Krippendorffs Alpha: 0.73). The interrater reliability showed good agreement (Cohen`s Kappa: 0.84, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The GUSS-ICU is a simple, reliable, and valid multi-consistency bedside swallowing screen to identify post-extubation dysphagia at the ICU.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04532398,31/08/2020.

Keywords: Aspiration pneumonia; Gugging Swallowing Screen; Intensive Care Unit; Post-extubation dysphagia; Speech therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Assessment and Evaluation sheet, severity categories and dietary recommendations of the Gugging Swallowing Screen – Intensive Care Unit (GUSS-ICU)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flowchart of patients included in the study: Definition of abbreviations: SLT = speech and language therapist, FEES = flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristic curve for both raters of the GUSS ICU as predictor for dysphagia as diagnosed by the FEES

References

    1. Baijens LW, Clavé P, Cras P, et al. European Society for Swallowing Disorders - European Union Geriatric Medicine Society white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia as a geriatric syndrome. Clin Interv Aging. 2016;11:1403–1428. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S107750. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poulsen SH, Rosenvinge PM, Modlinski RM, et al. Signs of dysphagia and associated outcomes regarding mortality, length of hospital stay and readmissions in acute geriatric patients: Observational prospective study. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;45:412–419. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.07.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Martino R, Foley N, Bhogal S, et al. Dysphagia after stroke: incidence, diagnosis, and pulmonary complications. Stroke. 2005;36:2756–2763. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000190056.76543.eb. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McIntyre M, Chimunda T, Koppa M, et al. Risk Factors for Postextubation Dysphagia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2022;132:364–374. doi: 10.1002/lary.29311. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macht M, Wimbish T, Clark BJ, et al. Postextubation dysphagia is persistent and associated with poor outcomes in survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Lond Engl. 2011;15:R231. doi: 10.1186/cc10472. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data