Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 13;23(1):240.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04176-6.

Evaluating a research training programme for frontline health workers in conflict-affected and fragile settings in the middle east

Hady Naal  1 , Tracy Daou  1 , Dayana Brome  1 , Rania Mansour  2 , Ghassan Abu Sittah  1 , Christos Giannou  1   3 , Enrique Steiger  4 , Shadi Saleh  1   5
Affiliations

Evaluating a research training programme for frontline health workers in conflict-affected and fragile settings in the middle east

Hady Naal et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Health Research Capacity Building (HRCB) is key to improving research production among health workers in LMICs to inform related policies and reduce health disparities in conflict settings. However, few HRCB programmes are available in the MENA region, and few evaluations of HRCB globally are reported in the literature.

Methods: Through a qualitative longitudinal design, we evaluated the first implementation of the Center for Research and Education in the Ecology of War (CREEW) fellowship. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fellows (n = 5) throughout the programme at key phases during their completion of courses and at each research phase. Additional data was collected from supervisors and peers of fellows at their organizations. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and presented under pre-identified themes.

Results: Despite the success of most fellows in learning on how to conduct research on AMR in conflict settings and completing the fellowship by producing research outputs, important challenges were identified. Results are categorized under predefined categories of (1) course delivery, (2) proposal development, (3) IRB application, (4) data collection, (5) data analysis, (6) manuscript write-up, (7) long-term effects, and (8) mentorship and networking.

Conclusion: The CREEW model, based on this evaluation, shows potential to be replicable and scalable to other contexts and other health-related topics. Detailed discussion and analysis are presented in the manuscript and synthesized recommendations are highlighted for future programmes to consider during the design, implementation, and evaluation of such programmes.

Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance; Capacity building; Conflict; Global health; Health research; LMIC; Middle east.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. The World Bank. Classification of Fragile and Conflict-Affected Situations, https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/fragilityconflictviolence/brief/harmo... (2021, accessed January 27, 2022).
    1. Kohrt BA, Mistry AS, Anand N et al. Health research in humanitarian crises: An urgent global imperative. BMJ Global Health; 4. Epub ahead of print November 1, 2019. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001870. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woodward A, Sheahan K, Martineau T et al. Health systems research in fragile and conflict affected states: a qualitative study of associated challenges. Health Research Policy and Systems 2017 15:1 2017; 15: 1–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Murray CJL, King G, Lopez AD, et al. Armed conflict as a public health problem. BMJ. 2002;324:346–9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7333.346. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Safeguarding Health in Conflict Coalition (SHCC). No respite: Violence against Health Care in Conflict, https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/SHCC%202021%20... (May 2021, accessed January 27, 2022).