Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 27;14(3):201-221.
doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102260. eCollection 2023.

JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy

Affiliations

JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy

Keith Siau et al. Frontline Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Introduction: In the UK, endoscopy certification is awarded when trainees attain minimum competency standards for independent practice. A national evidence-based review was undertaken to update and develop standards and recommendations for colonoscopy training and certification.

Methods: Under the oversight of the Joint Advisory Group (JAG), a modified Delphi process was conducted between 2019 and 2020 with multisociety expert representation. Following literature review and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations appraisal, recommendation statements on colonoscopy training and certification were formulated and subjected to anonymous voting to obtain consensus. Accepted statements were peer reviewed by JAG and relevant stakeholders for incorporation into the updated colonoscopy certification pathway.

Results: In total, 45 recommendation statements were generated under the domains of: definition of competence (13), acquisition of competence (20), assessment of competence (8) and postcertification support (4). The consensus process led to revised criteria for colonoscopy certification, comprising: (1) achieving key performance indicators defined within British Society of Gastroenterology standards (ie, unassisted caecal intubation rate >90%, rectal retroversion >90%, polyp detection rate >15%+, polyp retrieval rate >90%, patient comfort <10% with moderate-severe discomfort); (2) minimum procedure count 280+; (3) performing 15+ procedures over the preceding 3 months; (4) attendance of the JAG Basic Skills in Colonoscopy course; (5) terminal ileal intubation rates of 60%+ in inflammatory bowel disease; (6) satisfying requirements for formative direct observation of procedure skills (DOPS) and direct observation of polypectomy skills (Size, Morphology, Site, Access (SMSA) level 2); (7) evidence of reflective practice as documented on the JAG Endoscopy Training System reflection tool; (8) successful performance in summative DOPS.

Conclusion: The UK standards for training and certification in colonoscopy have been updated, culminating in a single-stage certification process with emphasis on polypectomy competency (SMSA Level 2+). These standards are intended to support training, improve standards of colonoscopy and polypectomy, and provide support to the newly independent practitioner.

Keywords: COLONOSCOPY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: ER has received research funding from Medtronic Ltd.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pathway for JAG training and certification in colonoscopy. * ≥90% unassisted caecal intubation rate, rectal retroflexion and polyp retrieval, ≤10% moderate/severe pain; ** Minimum of two direct observation of polypectomy skills (DOPyS) demonstrating competency for each of: cold snare polypectomy, diathermy-assisted resection of stalked polyps and diathermy-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for both Size, Morphology, Site, Access (SMSA) Level 1 and Level 2 polyps. JETS, JAG Endoscopy Training System.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gavin DR, Valori RM, Anderson JT, et al. . The National colonoscopy audit: a nationwide assessment of the quality and safety of colonoscopy in the UK. Gut 2013;62:242–9. 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301848 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burr NE, Derbyshire E, Taylor J, et al. . Variation in post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer across colonoscopy providers in English National health service: population based cohort study. BMJ 2019;367:l6090. 10.1136/bmj.l6090 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rees CJ, Thomas Gibson S, Rutter MD, et al. . Uk key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy. Gut 2016;65:1923–9. 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312044 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rees CJ, Koo S, Anderson J, et al. . British Society of gastroenterology endoscopy quality improvement programme (EQIP): overview and progress. Frontline Gastroenterol 2019;10:148–53. 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101073 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siau K, Green JT, Hawkes ND, et al. . Impact of the joint Advisory group on gastrointestinal endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond. Frontline Gastroenterol 2019;10:93–106. 10.1136/flgastro-2018-100969 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources