Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 11;15(3):e36031.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.36031. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources

Brian K Foster  1 , Clarice Callahan  2   3 , C Liam Dwyer  1
Affiliations

Readability of Online Hand and Upper Extremity Patient Resources

Brian K Foster et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background Online patient resources regarding hand and upper extremity topics published by professional societies are written at a level that exceeds that of the average reader. Methodology Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics published by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH), the American Association for Hand Surgery (AAHS), and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) were reviewed. The reading material from each topic page was analyzed using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) formulas. The reading level (FKGL) of each topic page was compared against an eighth-grade reading level, which corresponds to the average US reading level. Results A total of 170 online patient resources were reviewed, including 84 from the ASSH, 74 from the AAOS, and 12 from the AAHS. Overall, the mean FKGL was 9.1, and the mean FRE was 57.3. Overall, 50% of all hand and upper extremity online resources were written at or below an eighth-grade reading level. Pairwise testing revealed topic pages written by the ASSH had lower FKGL compared to those written by the AAHS (p = 0.046). Conclusions Online patient resources focused on hand and upper extremity topics are, on average, written at a level that exceeds the ability of the average reader. Comparisons between organizations showed a statistical, but not clinical, difference in readability measures. An emphasis on improving readability should be maintained as professional organizations continue to develop their online patient resources.

Keywords: hand surgery; online education; online medical education; orthopedic hand surgery; patient education; readability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Patient perceptions and current trends in internet use by orthopedic outpatients. Burrus MT, Werner BC, Starman JS, Kurkis GM, Pierre JM, Diduch DR, Hart JM. HSS J. 2017;13:271–275. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Orthopaedic patient information on the world wide web: an essential review. Cassidy JT, Baker JF. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:325–338. - PubMed
    1. Availability of accessible and high-quality information on the Internet for patients regarding the diagnosis and management of rotator cuff tears. Dalton DM, Kelly EG, Molony DC. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:0–40. - PubMed
    1. Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used? Dy CJ, Taylor SA, Patel RM, McCarthy MM, Roberts TR, Daluiski A. Hand (N Y) 2012;7:420–425. - PMC - PubMed
    1. The effect of search term on the quality and accuracy of online information regarding distal radius fractures. Dy CJ, Taylor SA, Patel RM, Kitay A, Roberts TR, Daluiski A. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:1881–1887. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources