Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopy in Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- PMID: 37057963
- DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0081
Three-Dimensional Versus Two-Dimensional Laparoscopy in Laparoscopic Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abstract
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy provides stereopsis and may reduce operating time (OT) and morbidity. However, there is a paucity of literature on its use in laparoscopic liver resection (LLR). This study aims to compare outcomes between 3D and two-dimensional (2D) LLR. Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched from inception to November 2022. The inclusion criterion was studies comparing intraoperative characteristics and/or postoperative outcomes between 3D and 2D LLR. Studies on the use of 3D image reconstruction techniques for preoperative planning were excluded. Primary outcomes were OT, estimated blood loss (EBL), and overall morbidity. Secondary outcomes were other postoperative complications, need for reoperation, and in-hospital mortality. Results: Four studies with 361 patients (3D: n = 159, 2D: n = 202) were included. There were 65.3% males (overall: n = 236/361). Age, sex, body-mass index, incidence of diabetes mellitus, hepatitis B and/or C carrier, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, tumor size, and incidence of multiple tumors were comparable between 3D and 2D LLR. No studies reported on Child-Pugh status. One study included only patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, two studies included patients with mixed histopathology, and one study did not report on histopathology. There was no significant difference in OT (mean difference [MD] -31.6 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -89.7 to 26.5), EBL (MD -454.1 mL, 95% CI: -978.8 to 70.6), need for reoperation (odds ratio [OR] 0.91, 95% CI: 0.18-4.61), and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.52, 95% CI: 0.06-5.50) between 3D and 2D LLR. Overall morbidity was lower in 3D LLR (OR 0.56, 95% CI: 0.32-0.98, P = .04). However, the learning curve (LC) was not described in the included studies and may confound outcomes. Conclusions: 3D LLR may reduce overall postoperative morbidity compared with 2D LLR, but results may be confounded by the lack of standardization of surgeons' experience and the LC of 3D LLR.
Keywords: hepatectomy; laparoscopy; liver resection; minimally invasive surgery; three-dimensional.
Similar articles
-
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic vs open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec 7;18(45):6657-68. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6657. World J Gastroenterol. 2012. PMID: 23236242 Free PMC article.
-
Open versus laparoscopic hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2019 Aug;33(8):2396-2418. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06781-3. Epub 2019 May 28. Surg Endosc. 2019. PMID: 31139980
-
Laparoscopic versus open limited liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma with liver cirrhosis: a propensity score matching study with the Hiroshima Surgical study group of Clinical Oncology (HiSCO).Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5055-5061. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07302-y. Epub 2019 Dec 11. Surg Endosc. 2020. PMID: 31828498
-
A meta-analysis: laparoscopic versus open liver resection for large hepatocellular carcinoma.Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2025 Feb;34(1):24-34. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2334762. Epub 2024 Apr 18. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2025. PMID: 38634257 Review.
-
Laparoscopic versus open resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: meta-analysis.Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 17;109(1):21-29. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab376. Br J Surg. 2021. PMID: 34757385
Cited by
-
3D laparoscopy and fluorescence imaging can improve surgical precision for hepatectomy.Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024 Jun 1;13(3):544-547. doi: 10.21037/hbsn-23-223. Epub 2023 Oct 28. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38911217 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical