Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 14;47(1):47.
doi: 10.1007/s10916-023-01943-2.

Developing a minimum data set for cardiovascular Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and mapping the data set to FHIR: A multi-method approach

Affiliations

Developing a minimum data set for cardiovascular Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and mapping the data set to FHIR: A multi-method approach

Mahdieh Montazeri et al. J Med Syst. .

Abstract

Many medical errors occur in the process of treating cardiovascular patients, and most of these errors are related to prescription errors. There are several, one of the methods to prevent prescription errors is the use of a computerized physician order entry (CPOE) system. One of the obstacles of implementing this system is improper design and non-compliance with user needs. one of the issues that should be considered in designing information systems is having a standard minimum data set (MDS). Although many computerized physicians order entry (CPOE) systems have been developed in the world, no study has identified the necessary data and minimum data set (MDS) of CPOE system, and published the process of creating this MDS. This study aimed to develop an MDS for cardiovascular CPOE and standardize it with Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR). A multi-method approach including systematic review for identifying data elements of CPOE, reviewing the content of medical records, validation of the data elements using the expert panel and, determination of the necessary data elements using a survey was conducted. Classification of the data elements and mapping them to FHIR were done to facilitate data sharing and integration with the electronic health record (EHR) system as well as to reduce data diversity. The final data elements of MDS were categorized into 5 main categories of FHIR (foundation, base, clinical, financial, and specialized) and 146 resources, where possible. Mapping was done by one of the researchers and checked and verified by the second researcher. Non-mapped data elements were added to relevant resources as extensions of existing FHIR resources. In total, 270 data elements were identified from the systematic review. After reviewing the content of 20 patients' medical records, 28 data elements were identified. After combination of data elements of two previous phases and removing duplication, 282 data elements remained. Data elements that were considered necessary to be included in CPOE by conducting a survey among cardiovascular physicians were 109 elements. From 146 resources of FHIR, the data elements of this MDS are covered by 5 resources. This study introduced an MDS for cardiovascular CPOE by combining suggested data elements of previous research, and the practical and local requirements identified in patients' medical records. To facilitate data sharing and integration with EHR, reduce data diversity, and also to categorize data, this MDS was standardized with FHIR. The steps we used to develop this MDS could be a model for creating MDS in other CPOEs and health information systems. This is the first time that the process of developing an MDS for cardiovascular CPOE has been presented in the literature.

Keywords: CPOE; Cardiovascular; FHIR; MDS; Minimum data set.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-disea... ). (Accessed on: 23-Aug-2021).
    1. Bates, D. W., Cullen, D. J., Laird, N., Petersen, L. A., Small, S. D., Servi, D., et al., Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. 274(1):29-34, 1995.
    1. Valentin, A., Capuzzo, M., Guidet, B., Moreno, R. P., Dolanski, L., Bauer, P., et al., Patient safety in intensive care: results from the multinational Sentinel Events Evaluation (SEE) study. Intensive Care Med. 32(10):1591–1598, 2006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zheng, W. Y., Richardson, L., Li, L., Day, R., Westbrook, J., Baysari, M., Drug-drug interactions and their harmful effects in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 74(1):15-27, 2018.
    1. Nuckols, T. K., Smith-Spangler, C., Morton, S. C., Asch, S. M., Patel, V. M., Anderson, L. J., et al., The effectiveness of computerized order entry at reducing preventable adverse drug events and medication errors in hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 3(1):56, 2014.

LinkOut - more resources