Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review
- PMID: 37058184
- PMCID: PMC10244286
- DOI: 10.1007/s11282-023-00683-w
Analysis of peri-implant bone defects by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): an integrative review
Abstract
The objective of this work was to perform an integrative review of the inspection of peri-implant bone defects using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). An electronic search was performed in the PubMed database using the following scientific terms: CBCT or Cone Beam computed tomography; dental implant; peri-implant; bone loss; defects. The survey identified 267 studies, of which 18 were considered relevant to this study. These studies provided important data taking into account the accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in the detection and measurement of peri-implant bone defects such as fenestrations, dehiscence and intraosseous circumferential defects. The effectiveness of CBCT in aiding in geometric bone calculations and in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects was influenced by factors such as artefacts, defect size, bone wall thickness, implant material, adjustment of acquisition parameters and observer experience. A not insignificant number of studies compared intraoral radiography to CBCT in the detection of peri-implant bone loss. CBCT was clearly superior to intraoral radiography in the detection of all peri-implant bone defects, except for defects located in the interproximal zone. In general, studies have shown that peri-implant bone measurements adjacent to the implant surface can be correctly determined, as well as the diagnosis of peri-implant bone defects with an average discrepancy of less than 1 mm from the actual measurement of the defect.
Keywords: Bone loss; CBCT; Cone-beam computed tomography; Dental implant; Peri-implant.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Not applicable.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Efficacy of low-dose cone beam computed tomography and metal artifact reduction tool for assessment of peri-implant bone defects: an in vitro study.BMC Oral Health. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02663-8. BMC Oral Health. 2022. PMID: 36528573 Free PMC article.
-
Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023 Nov;52(8):20230252. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20230252. Epub 2023 Sep 4. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2023. PMID: 37641961 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants-An in vitro study.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Sep;29(9):922-930. doi: 10.1111/clr.13348. Epub 2018 Aug 15. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018. PMID: 30112833
-
CBCT vs other imaging modalities to assess peri-implant bone and diagnose complications: a systematic review.Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11 Suppl 1:77-92. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018. PMID: 30109301
-
Diagnostic performance of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review.Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 May;29(5):443-464. doi: 10.1111/clr.13143. Epub 2018 Mar 26. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018. PMID: 29578266
Cited by
-
Efficacy of two radiographic algorithms for detection of peri-implant bone defects on cone-beam computed tomography scans.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05397-x. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 39773233 Free PMC article.
-
Volumetric analysis of artifacts from fiducial markers under cone beam computed tomography.J Dent Sci. 2024 Apr;19(2):1004-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Jul 16. J Dent Sci. 2024. PMID: 38618050 Free PMC article.
-
Osseodensification vs. Conventional Osteotomy: A Case Series with Cone Beam Computed Tomography.J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 9;13(6):1568. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061568. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38541794 Free PMC article.
-
Three-dimensional analysis of root canal curvature in maxillary premolars using CBCT images.Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):9356. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94026-w. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40102564 Free PMC article.
-
Enhanced bacteriostasis and osseointegrative properties of SiRNA-modified polyetheretherketone surface for implant applications.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 5;19(12):e0314091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314091. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39636795 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Fienitz T, Schwarz F, Ritter L, Dreiseidler T, Becker J, Rothamel D. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone defect regeneration: a histologically controlled study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(7):882–887. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02232.x. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Pelekos G, Tse JMN, Ho D, Tonetti MS. Defect morphology, bone thickness, exposure settings and examiner experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of standardized digital periapical radiographic images but not of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant osseous defects: A. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(12):1294–1302. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13200. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Hilgenfeld T, Juerchott A, Deisenhofer UK, Krisam J, Rammelsberg P, Heiland S, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography, dental magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoral radiography for detecting peri-implant bone defects at single zirconia implants—an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(9):922–930. doi: 10.1111/clr.13348. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources