Decision regret among women considering planned oocyte cryopreservation: a prospective cohort study
- PMID: 37058259
- PMCID: PMC10310667
- DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02789-w
Decision regret among women considering planned oocyte cryopreservation: a prospective cohort study
Abstract
Purpose: To (1) prospectively characterize the incidence of decision regret among women considering planned oocyte cryopreservation (planned OC), comparing those who pursued treatment vs those who did not freeze eggs, and (2) to identify baseline predictors for future decision regret.
Methods: A total of 173 women seen in consultation for planned OC were followed prospectively. Surveys were administered at (1) baseline (< 1 week after initial consultation) and (2) follow-up, 6 months after planned OC among participants who froze eggs or 6 months following consultation in the absence of further communication to pursue treatment. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe decision regret, indicated by a Decision Regret Scale score > 25. We also examined predictors of regret.
Results: The incidence of moderate-to-severe regret over the decision to freeze eggs was 9% compared to 51% over the decision not to pursue treatment. Among women who froze eggs, adequacy of information at baseline to decide about treatment (aOR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03, 0.87) and emphasis on future parenthood (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66, 0.99) were associated with reduced odds of regret. Forty-six percent of women who froze eggs regretted not doing so earlier. Among women who did not freeze eggs, the primary reasons were financial and time constraints, correlating with increased odds of decision regret in an exploratory analysis.
Conclusions: Among women undergoing planned OC, the incidence of decision regret is low compared to the regret confronting women seen in consultation for planned OC but who do not pursue treatment. Provider counseling is key to offset the regret risk.
Keywords: Decision regret; Fertility preservation; Oocyte freezing; Planned oocyte cryopreservation.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
The study funder, EMD Serono, provided renumeration for participant time and effort. The funder provided financial support only and was not involved in the study design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of study results. EGJ received an investigator-sponsored research grant from the study funder, EMD Serono. LP, AM, RW, JC, MIC, and HGH have nothing to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation.Fertil Steril. 2018 Jun;109(6):1097-1104.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.127. Epub 2018 May 25. Fertil Steril. 2018. PMID: 29807657
-
Decision-making in women who considered planned oocyte cryopreservation: decision satisfaction or regret?Reprod Biomed Online. 2025 Feb;50(2):103944. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2024.103944. Epub 2024 Mar 14. Reprod Biomed Online. 2025. PMID: 39799100
-
Decision regret and associated factors following oocyte cryopreservation in patients with diminished ovarian reserve and/or age-related fertility decline.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Jun;38(6):1469-1479. doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02164-7. Epub 2021 Apr 2. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021. PMID: 33797008 Free PMC article.
-
Oocyte cryopreservation review: outcomes of medical oocyte cryopreservation and planned oocyte cryopreservation.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022 Jan 7;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00884-0. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2022. PMID: 34996479 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.Fertil Steril. 2021 Jul;116(1):36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.024. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 34148587 Review.
Cited by
-
Eggsurance? A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid for elective egg freezing.Hum Reprod. 2024 Aug 1;39(8):1724-1734. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae121. Hum Reprod. 2024. PMID: 38876980 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
No guarantees: planned oocyte cryopreservation, not quite an insurance policy.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Oct;310(4):1889-1894. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07654-4. Epub 2024 Aug 3. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 39096366 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Do women accurately predict their odds of having a child following planned oocyte cryopreservation?Reprod Fertil. 2025 Feb 27;6(1):e240118. doi: 10.1530/RAF-24-0118. Print 2025 Jan 1. Reprod Fertil. 2025. PMID: 39950867 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2014. National vital statistics reports : from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. 2015;64(12):1-64. - PubMed
-
- Matthews TJ, Hamilton BE. Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life. NCHS Data Brief. 2009;21:1–8. - PubMed
-
- Planned oocyte cryopreservation for women seeking to preserve future reproductive potential: an ethics committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(6):1022–8. - PubMed