Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 14:25:e41807.
doi: 10.2196/41807.

Characterizing Consumer Smartphone Apps for Virtual Reality-Based Exposure Therapy: Content Analysis

Charvi Sunkara  1 , Rajvi Thakkar  1 , Triton Ong  2 , Brian E Bunnell  1   2
Affiliations

Characterizing Consumer Smartphone Apps for Virtual Reality-Based Exposure Therapy: Content Analysis

Charvi Sunkara et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: In vivo exposure therapy is the most effective treatment for phobias but is often impractical. Virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) can help overcome critical barriers to in vivo exposure therapy. However, accessible mobile software related to VRET is not well understood.

Objective: The purpose of our study is to describe the landscape of accessible smartphone apps with potential utility for clinical VRET.

Methods: We conducted a content analysis of publicly available smartphone apps related to virtual reality on the Google Play Store and the Apple App Store as of March 2020.

Results: The initial search yielded 525 apps, with 84 apps (52 on the Google Play Store and 32 on the Apple App Store) included for analysis. The most common phobic stimulus depicted was bodies of water or weather events (25/84, 29.8%), followed by heights (24/84, 28.6%), and animals (23/84, 27.4%). More than half of the apps were visually abstract (39/84, 53.5%). Most apps were free to use (48/84, 57.1%), while the rest were free to try (22/84, 26.2%) or required payment for use (14/84, 16.7%), with the highest cost for use being US $6. The average overall app rating was 2.9 stars out of 5, but the number of ratings ranged from 0 to 49,233. None of the 84 apps advertised compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, offered the ability to monitor data, provided clinician control over variables in the app experiences, or explicitly stated use by or development with clinicians.

Conclusions: None of the smartphone apps reviewed were explicitly developed for phobia therapy. However, 16 of the 84 included apps were considered ideal candidates to investigate further as part of treatment due to their accessibility, depiction of phobia-relevant stimuli, low or no cost, and high user scores. Most of these apps were visually abstract and free to use, making them accessible and potentially flexible as part of clinical exposure hierarchies. However, none of the apps were designed for clinical use, nor did they provide tools for clinician workflows. Formal evaluation of these accessible smartphone apps is needed to understand the clinical potential of accessible VRET solutions.

Keywords: VR; apps; clinical evaluation; consumer apps; content analysis; exposure therapy; mHealth apps; mobile phone apps; phobia; smartphone apps; smartphones; treatment; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: BB and TO are employees of Doxy.me Inc, a commercial telemedicine company.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart for app inclusion. VR: virtual reality.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rating distributions for each app store.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Phobia. APA Dictionary of Psychology. [2021-10-26]. https://dictionary.apa.org/phobia .
    1. Wardenaar K, Lim Ccw, Al-Hamzawi Ao, Alonso J, Andrade Lh, Benjet C, Bunting B, de Girolamo G, Demyttenaere K, Florescu Se, Gureje O, Hisateru T, Hu C, Huang Y, Karam E, Kiejna A, Lepine Jp, Navarro-Mateu F, Oakley Browne M, Piazza M, Posada-Villa J, ten Have Ml, Torres Y, Xavier M, Zarkov Z, Kessler Rc, Scott Km, de Jonge P. The cross-national epidemiology of specific phobia in the World Mental Health Surveys. Psychol Med. 2017 Feb 22;47(10):1744–1760. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000174. doi: 10.1017/s0033291717000174. - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Konnopka A, König Hannah. Economic burden of anxiety disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Jan 24;38(1):25–37. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00849-7. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00849-7.10.1007/s40273-019-00849-7 - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salokangas R, Luutonen Sinikka, Heinimaa Markus, From Tiina, Hietala Jarmo. A study on the association of psychiatric diagnoses and childhood adversities with suicide risk. Nord J Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;73(2):125–131. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1493748. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2018.1493748. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wersebe H, Lieb Roselind, Meyer Andrea H, Miche Marcel, Mikoteit Thorsten, Imboden Christian, Hoyer Jürgen, Bader Klaus, Hatzinger Martin, Gloster Andrew T. Well-being in major depression and social phobia with and without comorbidity. Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2018;18(3):201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2018.06.004. https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1697-2600(18)30053-X S1697-2600(18)30053-X - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources