Work as an arena for health-Supervisors' experiences with attending to employees' sick leave and return-to-work process
- PMID: 37058510
- PMCID: PMC10104318
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284369
Work as an arena for health-Supervisors' experiences with attending to employees' sick leave and return-to-work process
Abstract
Background: Supervisors play a pivotal role in the sick leave process. Although responsibility for sick leave and return to work follow-up is increasingly placed on the workplace in Norway, few studies have explored supervisors' experiences. This study aims to explore supervisors´ experiences with attending to employees' sick leave and return to work process.
Methods: This study consists of individual interviews with 11 supervisors from diverse workplaces that was analysed thematically.
Results: The supervisors emphasised the value of presence at the workplace, the need for them to obtain information and uphold dialogue, considering individual and environmental influences on return-to-work and allocating responsibility. Investing time and money was crucial to prevent or reduce the negative impact of sick leave.
Conclusions: The supervisors' perception of attending to sick leave and return-to-work largely reflect Norwegian legislation. However, they find obtaining information and managing responsibility challenging, suggesting that their responsibilities for return-to-work are perhaps disproportionate to their knowledge on attending this process. Individualised support and guidance on how to develop accommodations based on the employee´s workability should be made available. The reciprocal nature of follow-up described also reveals how the return-to-work process is enmeshed with (inter)personal considerations possibly resulting in unequal treatment.
Copyright: © 2023 Klevanger et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. MBR participated in 2017 and 2018 as a research advisor regarding a study conducted and funded by Janssen-Cilag A/S.
Similar articles
-
How Can Supervisors Contribute to the Return to Work of Employees Who have Experienced Depression?J Occup Rehabil. 2018 Jun;28(2):279-288. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9715-0. J Occup Rehabil. 2018. PMID: 28660364
-
Supervisors' views on employer responsibility in the return to work process. A focus group study.J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Mar;17(1):93-106. doi: 10.1007/s10926-006-9041-4. J Occup Rehabil. 2007. PMID: 16816996
-
Navigating work and life- a qualitative exploration of managers' and employees' views of return-to-work after sick leave due to common mental disorders.BMC Public Health. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-17765-x. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38317150 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Aligning stakeholders' understandings of the return-to-work process: a qualitative study on workplace meetings in inpatient multimodal occupational rehabilitation.Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1946927. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1946927. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021. PMID: 34278973 Free PMC article.
-
Return-to-work interventions for persons/employees with mental illnesses.Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 1;35(4):293-301. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000793. Epub 2022 Jun 9. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2022. PMID: 35674707 Review.
References
-
- Corbiere M, Mazaniello-Chezol M, Bastien MF, Wathieu E, Bouchard R, Panaccio A, et al.. Stakeholders’ Role and Actions in the Return-to-Work Process of Workers on Sick-Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review. J Occup Rehabil. 2019. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources