Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 14;18(4):e0284369.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284369. eCollection 2023.

Work as an arena for health-Supervisors' experiences with attending to employees' sick leave and return-to-work process

Affiliations

Work as an arena for health-Supervisors' experiences with attending to employees' sick leave and return-to-work process

Nina Elisabeth Klevanger et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Supervisors play a pivotal role in the sick leave process. Although responsibility for sick leave and return to work follow-up is increasingly placed on the workplace in Norway, few studies have explored supervisors' experiences. This study aims to explore supervisors´ experiences with attending to employees' sick leave and return to work process.

Methods: This study consists of individual interviews with 11 supervisors from diverse workplaces that was analysed thematically.

Results: The supervisors emphasised the value of presence at the workplace, the need for them to obtain information and uphold dialogue, considering individual and environmental influences on return-to-work and allocating responsibility. Investing time and money was crucial to prevent or reduce the negative impact of sick leave.

Conclusions: The supervisors' perception of attending to sick leave and return-to-work largely reflect Norwegian legislation. However, they find obtaining information and managing responsibility challenging, suggesting that their responsibilities for return-to-work are perhaps disproportionate to their knowledge on attending this process. Individualised support and guidance on how to develop accommodations based on the employee´s workability should be made available. The reciprocal nature of follow-up described also reveals how the return-to-work process is enmeshed with (inter)personal considerations possibly resulting in unequal treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. MBR participated in 2017 and 2018 as a research advisor regarding a study conducted and funded by Janssen-Cilag A/S.

Similar articles

References

    1. Corbiere M, Mazaniello-Chezol M, Bastien MF, Wathieu E, Bouchard R, Panaccio A, et al.. Stakeholders’ Role and Actions in the Return-to-Work Process of Workers on Sick-Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review. J Occup Rehabil. 2019. - PubMed
    1. Johnston V, Way K, Long MH, Wyatt M, Gibson L, Shaw WS. Supervisor competencies for supporting return to work: a mixed-methods study. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):3–17. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9511-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strunin L, Boden LI. Paths of reentry: employment experiences of injured workers. Am J Ind Med. 2000;38(4):373–84. doi: 10.1002/1097-0274(200010)38:4<373::aid-ajim2>3.0.co;2-y - DOI - PubMed
    1. Briand C, Durand MJ, St-Arnaud L, Corbiere M. Work and mental health: learning from return-to-work rehabilitation programs designed for workers with musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007;30(4–5):444–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.06.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nordqvist C, Holmqvist C, Alexanderson K. Views of laypersons on the role employers play in return to work when sick-listed. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(1):11–20. doi: 10.1023/a:1021841722613 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types