Fertility Preservation Decisional Turning Points for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Exploring Alignment and Divergence by Race and Ethnicity
- PMID: 37058685
- PMCID: PMC10337714
- DOI: 10.1200/OP.22.00613
Fertility Preservation Decisional Turning Points for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Exploring Alignment and Divergence by Race and Ethnicity
Abstract
Purpose: For adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer, fertility preservation (FP) decision making is complex and distressing. Racial/ethnic minority (REM) AYAs experience disparities in FP awareness, uptake, and outcomes. A turning point (TP) is a point of reflection, change, or decisive moment(s) resulting in changes in perspectives or trajectories. To enhance understanding of AYAs' diverse experiences, this study examined alignment and/or divergence of FP decisional TPs among non-Hispanic White (NHW) AYAs and REM AYAs.
Methods: Qualitative semistructured interviews were conducted in person, by video, or phone with 36 AYAs (20 NHW and 16 REM [nine Hispanic and seven Black/multiracial Black). The constant comparative method was used to identify and analyze themes illustrating participants' conceptualization and/or experience of FP decisional TPs.
Results: Seven thematic TPs emerged: (1) emotional reaction to discovering FP procedures exist; (2) encountering unclear or dismissive communication during initial fertility conversations with health care providers; (3) encountering direct and supportive communication during initial fertility conversations with health care providers; (4) participating in critical family conversations about pursuing FP; (5) weighing personal desire for a child against other priorities/circumstances; (6) realizing FP is not feasible, and (7) experiencing unanticipated changes in cancer diagnosis or treatment plans/procedures. TP variations include REM participants reported dismissive communication and suggested cost was prohibitive. NHW participants emphasized more forcefully that biological children may become a future priority.
Conclusion: Understanding how clinical communication and priorities/resources may vary for NHW and REM AYAs can inform future interventions aimed at reducing health disparities and enhancing patient-centered care.
Conflict of interest statement
The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to
Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (
Similar articles
-
Transgender and Gender Diverse Fertility Choices: Supporting the Decision-Making Process for Adolescents and Young Adults.J Pediatr. 2022 Jan;240:256-264.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 28. J Pediatr. 2022. PMID: 34717962
-
A conceptual model of fertility concerns among adolescents and young adults with cancer.Psychooncology. 2021 Aug;30(8):1383-1392. doi: 10.1002/pon.5695. Epub 2021 Apr 17. Psychooncology. 2021. PMID: 33843104 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of participating in family-centered fertility research among adolescent and young adult males newly diagnosed with cancer: A qualitative study.Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019 Nov;66(11):e27966. doi: 10.1002/pbc.27966. Epub 2019 Aug 12. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31407498 Free PMC article.
-
What factors hinder the decision-making process for women with cancer and contemplating fertility preservation treatment?Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Jul 1;23(4):433-457. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmx009. Hum Reprod Update. 2017. PMID: 28510760 Review.
-
An Integrative Review of the Role of Nurses in Fertility Preservation for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.Oncol Nurs Forum. 2021 Sep 1;48(5):491-505. doi: 10.1188/21.ONF.491-505. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2021. PMID: 34411081 Review.
Cited by
-
Elective Reconstruction for Children With Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia: Evaluating Association of Familial Characteristics.J Surg Res. 2025 Sep;313:291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.06.029. Epub 2025 Jul 17. J Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40680596
-
Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Patient Experiences in Fertility Preservation: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adolescents and Young Adults (AYAs) with Cancer.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 13;15(24):5828. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245828. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38136372 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inequalities in Fertility-Impacting Cancer Incidence Among Young Populations in the United States.Cancer Med. 2025 Apr;14(7):e70797. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70797. Cancer Med. 2025. PMID: 40189850 Free PMC article.
-
Designing Patient-Reported Measures of Fertility: Cognitive Interview Findings from Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer.J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2025 Apr;14(2):180-186. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2024.0042. Epub 2024 Aug 20. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39162473
-
Are we Only Doing Good? Long-term Psychosocial Effects of Fertility Preservation (or Lack Thereof) on Survivors of Cancer During Adolescence and Young Adulthood.Cancer J. 2025 Jul-Aug 01;31(4):e0774. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000774. Epub 2025 Aug 11. Cancer J. 2025. PMID: 40768303 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Miller KD, Fidler-Benaoudia M, Keegan TH, et al. Cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70:443–459. - PubMed
-
- Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, et al. Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:1994–2001. - PubMed
-
- Coccia PF, Pappo AS, Beaupin L, et al. Adolescent and young adult oncology, version 2.2018, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018;16:66–97. - PubMed
-
- Logan S, Perz J, Ussher J, et al. Clinician provision of oncofertility support in cancer patients of a reproductive age: A systematic review. Psychooncology. 2018;27:748–756. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical