Prognostic value of TLR from FDG PET/CT in patients with margin-negative stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer
- PMID: 37060445
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-09641-w
Prognostic value of TLR from FDG PET/CT in patients with margin-negative stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the prognostic value of TLR from PET/CT in patients with resection margin-negative stage IB and IIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and compare high-risk factors necessitating adjuvant treatment (AT).
Methods: Consecutive FDG PET/CT scans performed for the initial staging of NSCLC stage IB and IIA were retrospectively reviewed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of the primary tumor and mean SUV of the liver were acquired. The tumor-to-liver SUV ratio (TLR) was also calculated. Charts were reviewed for basic patient characteristics and high-risk factors for considering AT (poor differentiation, visceral pleura invasion, vascular invasion, tumors > 4 cm, and wedge resection). Statistical analysis was performed using Cox regression analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: Of the 112 patients included, 15 (13.4%) died, with a median overall survival (OS) of 43.8 months. Twenty-two patients (19.6%) exhibited recurrence, with median disease-free survival (DFS) of 36.0 months. In univariable analysis, pathology, poor differentiation, and TLR were associated with shorter DFS and OS. In multivariable analysis, TLR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.263, p = 0.008) and differentiation (HR = 3.087, p = 0.012) were associated with shorter DFS. Also, TLR (HR = 1.422, p < 0.001) was associated with shorter OS.
Conclusion: TLR from FDG PET/CT was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence and survival. PET parameters constitute risk factors for consideration in the decision-making for AT in margin-negative stage IB and IIA NSCLC.
Clinical relevance statement: In this study, TLR from FDG PET/CT was an independent prognostic factor in stage IB-IIA non-small cell cancer patients. Although additional validation studies are warranted, TLR has the potential to be used to determine the need for adjuvant therapy.
Key points: • High TLR is an independent poor prognostic factor in stage IB-IIA NSCLC. • Adjuvant treatment should be considered in patients with high TLR following complete tumor resection.
Keywords: Adjuvant treatment; Carcinoma, non-small cell lung; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Prognosis; Stage IB-IIA.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.
References
-
- Postmus PE, Kerr KM, Oudkerk M et al (2017) Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 28:iv1-iv21
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Version3.2022). Available via https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf . Accessed 3 June 2022
-
- Zuo Z, Zhang G, Song P et al (2021) Survival nomogram for stage IB non-small-cell lung cancer patients, based on the SEER database and an external validation cohort. Ann Surg Oncol 28:3941–3950 - PubMed
-
- Okiror L, Harling L, Toufektzian L et al (2018) Prognostic factors including lymphovascular invasion on survival for resected non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 156:785–793 - PubMed
-
- Mollberg NM, Bennette C, Howell E, Backhus L, Devine B, Ferguson MK (2014) Lymphovascular invasion as a prognostic indicator in stage I non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 97:965–971 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
