Preference for uterine tamponade devices as a barrier to research: a provider survey

Affiliations

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Nandi Regional Hospital, University of KwaZulu-Natal, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
² Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chris Hani Baragwaneth Academic Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
³ Effective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa; University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana. Electronic address: justhof@gmail.com.

Comment

Logie Govender et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Jul.

. 2023 Jul;5(7):100970.

doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100970. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

¹ Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Nandi Regional Hospital, University of KwaZulu-Natal, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.
² Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Chris Hani Baragwaneth Academic Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
³ Effective Care Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Walter Sisulu University, Mthatha, South Africa; University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana. Electronic address: justhof@gmail.com.

No abstract available

Comment on

Traditional uterine tamponade and vacuum-induced uterine tamponade devices in obstetrical hemorrhage management.
Phillips JM, Eppes C, Rodriguez M, Sakamoto S. Phillips JM, et al. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 Feb;5(2S):100739. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100739. Epub 2022 Sep 1. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023. PMID: 36058519 Review.