Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Apr 15;401(10384):1277-1292.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00285-4.

Anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer: a patient-level meta-analysis of 100 000 women from 86 randomised trials

Collaborators
Meta-Analysis

Anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer: a patient-level meta-analysis of 100 000 women from 86 randomised trials

Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Electronic address: bc.overview@ctsu.ox.ac.uk et al. Lancet. .

Abstract

Background: Anthracycline-taxane chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer substantially improves survival compared with no chemotherapy. However, concerns about short-term and long-term side-effects of anthracyclines have led to increased use of taxane chemotherapy without anthracycline, which could compromise efficacy. We aimed to better characterise the benefits and risks of including anthracycline, and the comparative benefits of different anthracycline-taxane regimens.

Methods: We did an individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials comparing taxane regimens with versus without anthracycline, and updated our previous meta-analysis of anthracycline regimens with versus without taxane, as well as analysing 44 trials in six related comparisons. We searched databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and meeting abstracts to identify trials assessing anthracycline and taxane chemotherapy. Adjuvant or neoadjuvant trials were eligible if they began before Jan 1, 2012. Primary outcomes were breast cancer recurrence and cause-specific mortality. Log-rank analyses yielded first-event rate ratios (RRs) and CIs.

Findings: 28 trials of taxane regimens with or without anthracycline were identified, of which 23 were deemed eligible, and 15 provided data on 18 103 women. Across all 15 trials that provided individual data, recurrence rates were 14% lower on average (RR 0·86, 95% CI 0·79-0·93; p=0·0004) with taxane regimens including anthracycline than those without. Non-breast cancer deaths were not increased but there was one additional acute myeloid leukaemia case per 700 women treated. The clearest reductions in recurrence were found when anthracycline was added concurrently to docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide versus the same dose of docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (10-year recurrence risk 12·3% vs 21·0%; risk difference 8·7%, 95% CI 4·5-12·9; RR 0·58, 0·47-0·73; p<0·0001). 10-year breast cancer mortality in this group was reduced by 4·2% (0·4-8·1; p=0·0034). No significant reduction in recurrence risk was found for sequential schedules of taxane plus anthracycline when compared with docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (RR 0·94, 0·83-1·06; p=0·30). For the analysis of anthracycline regimens with versus without taxane, 35 trials (n=52 976) provided individual patient data. Larger recurrence reductions were seen from adding taxane to anthracycline regimens when the cumulative dose of anthracycline was the same in each group (RR 0·87, 0·82-0·93; p<0·0001; n=11 167) than in trials with two-fold higher cumulative doses of non-taxane (mostly anthracycline) in the control group than in the taxane group (RR 0·96, 0·90-1·03; p=0·27; n=14 620). Direct comparisons between anthracycline and taxane regimens showed that a higher cumulative dose and more dose-intense schedules were more efficacious. The proportional reductions in recurrence for taxane plus anthracycline were similar in oestrogen receptor-positive and oestrogen receptor-negative disease, and did not differ by age, nodal status, or tumour size or grade.

Interpretation: Anthracycline plus taxane regimens are most efficacious at reducing breast cancer recurrence and death. Regimens with higher cumulative doses of anthracycline plus taxane provide the greatest benefits, challenging the current trend in clinical practice and guidelines towards non-anthracycline chemotherapy, particularly shorter regimens, such as four cycles of docetaxel-cyclophosphamide. By bringing together data from almost all relevant trials, this meta-analysis provides a reliable evidence base to inform individual treatment decisions, clinical guidelines, and the design of future clinical trials.

Funding: Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research Council.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests RG reports that EBCTCG is supported by a Cancer Research UK grant paid to the University of Oxford. SA reports institutional grants or contracts from National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute, consulting fees from NSBAP Foundation, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Jazz Pharmaceuticals (Study 15-007). JBe reports institutional grants or contracts from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Merck, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi-Aventis to Karolinska Institute or University Hospital, or both; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Stratipath; a leadership or fiduciary role on the Wnt-research; stock or stock options in Stratipath; and honoraria from UpToDate to Asklepios Medicine. JBl reports consulting fees from Myriad Genetics, Seattle Genetics, Immunomedics, Puma Biotechnology, Athenix, OncLive, Biotheranostics, AstraZeneca, Research to Practice, Sanofi, Pfizer, and Tempus; and payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, and manuscript writing or educational events from Pfizer and Tempus. FC reports consulting fees from Amgen, Astella/Medivation, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, GE Oncology, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Iqvia, Macrogenics, Medscape, Merck-Sharp, Merus BV, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, priME Oncology, Roche, Sanofi, Samsung Bioepis, Seagen, Teva, and Touchime; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Amgen, Astellas/Medivation, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, GE Oncology, Genentech, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Iqvia, Macrogenics, Medscape, Merck-Sharp, Merus BV, Mylan, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, priME Oncology, Roche, Sanofi, Samsung Bioepis, Seagen, Teva, and Touchime; and support for attending meetings or travel (or both) from AstraZeneca, Roche, and Pfizer. JC reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, and manuscript writing or educational events from Pfizer and Pierre Fabre; support for attending meeting or travel (or both) from MSD Oncology, Pfizer, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo Europe, AstraZeneca, and Regeneron; a patent pending for WO2020011770 (A1)—a method of predicting response to treatment in cancer patients; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for MSD Oncology and AstraZeneca; a leadership or fiduciary role for The Cancer Clinical Research Trust, OncoMark, and OncoAssure; and stock or stock options from OncoMark and OncoAssure. BE reports institutional grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Samsung Bioepis, and received support for attending meetings or travel (or both) from MSD. TF reports payments or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, and manuscript writing or education events from Lilly and Novartis. NH reports payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, and manuscript writing or education events from Amgen, AstraZeneca Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pierre-Fabre, Pfizer, Rocher, and Seagen; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Gilead, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seagen; and a leadership or fiduciary role at West German Study Group (WSG). MBJ reports institutional grants or contracts from Samsung Bioepis and Oncology Venture and receives support for attending meetings or travel (or both) from Novartis. EM reports consulting fees from Exact Sciences, Genentech/Roche, Merck, Hologic, Genzyme-Sanofi, and Tersera; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, and manuscript writing or educational events from Exact Sciences, Genentech/Roche, and Merck; and stock or stock options from Moderna. LN reports consulting fees from Martell Diagnostic Laboratories, Celgene, Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, Codagenix, Agenus, Immix Biopharma, QLS Advisors, and Samus Therapeutics. JO reports consulting fees and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, and manuscript writing or education events from AbbVie, Agendia, Amgen Biotechnology, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Clovis Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, G1 Therapeutics, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GRAIL, Halozyme Therapeutics, Heron Therapeutics, Immunomedics, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Lilly, Merck, Myriad, Nektar Therapeutics, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Pierre Fabre Pharmaceuticals, Puma Biotechnology, Prime Oncology, Roche, Samsung Bioepis, Sanofi, Seagen, Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Taiho Oncology, Tekeda, and Synthon. MP reports institutional grants or contracts from AstraZeneca, Immunomedics, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Radious, Roche–Genentech, Servier, and Synthon; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Camel-IDS/Precirix, Gilead, Immunomedics, Lilly, Menarini, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche–Genentech, Seattle Genetics, Immutep, Seagen, NBE Therapeutics, and Frame Therapeutics; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, and manuscript writing or educational events from Roche, Novartis, and MSD. NR reports institutional grants or contracts from Bristol-Myers Squibb. DS reports consulting fees from Eli Lilly and Novartis; a leadership or fiduciary role for BioMarin, TORL BioTherapeutics, and 1200 Pharma; and stock or stock options for Amgen, Seattle Genetics, TORL BioTherapeutics, 1200 Pharma, BioNarin, and Pfizer. SS reports institutional grants or contracts from Genentech/Roche, Kailos Genetics, and BCRF; consulting fees from Roche/Genentech, and Molecular Therapeutics; payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, and manuscript writing or education events from Genetech/Roche and Daiichi Sankyo; support for attending meetings or travel (or both) from Genentech/Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, and Sanofi; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Exact Sciences, Biotheranostics, Netera, Merck, Silverback Therapeutics, Athenex, Lilly, Aventis, and Inivata; a leadership or fiduciary role for NSABP (Vice Chairman) and CFF (ASCO Director); and third party medical writing for Genentech/Roche and AstraZeneca. GY reports institutional grants or contracts from the US National Cancer Institute to support the NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Centre.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:. Recurrence of breast cancer (first invasive local, distant, or new contralateral primary) in the 15 trials with patient-level data comparing taxane plus anthracycline versus taxane without anthracycline
24 trials in total. One trial (N-SAS-BC 02) is shown on two lines as it was a 2 X 2 trial. Eight trials did not provide data. Taxanes were D and P. Anthracyclines were A and E. Other agents were C, F, M, Trz, Vrb, Cap, Cpt, and Ptz. 99% CIs are provided for individual trial data; 95% CIs are provided for subtotal and total data. A=doxorubicin. AUC=area under the curve. C=cyclophosphamide. Cap=capecitabine. Cpt=carboplatin. D=docetaxel. d=day of cycle. E=epirubicin. F=fluorouracil. M=methotrexate. O–E=observed minus expected. P=paclitaxel. Ptz=pertuzumab. q1=weekly. q2=every 2 weeks. q3=every 3 weeks. q4=every 4 weeks. Trz=trastuzumab. Vrb=vinorelbine. v.v=vice versa. yr=year. 2p=two-sided p value. *Any unstated doses are the same as for the non-anthracycline comparator. The regimens being compared in each study are described by the number of cycles, the drug abbreviation and dose in mg/m², and the frequency of the doses; a solidus (/) indicates or; a semicolon indicates then (sequential treatment). †For balance, control patients in three-way trials or trial strata count half or twice in subtotal(s) and in the final total of events and patients. ‡Pre-operative chemotherapy.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:. 10-year cumulative risk of outcomes with taxane plus anthracycline versus taxane without anthracycline
All analyses included 18 103 participants (9076 in taxane plus anthracycline group, 9027 in taxane only group). 10-year cumulative risk of any invasive recurrence (A), breast cancer mortality (B), death without recurrence (C)*, and any death (D)*. Error bars show 95% CI. O–E=observed minus expected. RR=rate ratio. V=variance. 2p=two-sided p value. *Smoothed after 5 years (denoted by dotted line).
Figure 3:
Figure 3:. 10-year cumulative risk of any recurrence and breast cancer mortality in patients on taxane-based regimens with anthracycline versus without anthracycline
Risk of recurrence (A) or breast cancer mortality (B) in 2469 patients on concurrent anthracycline plus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (n=1236) versus same cumulative dose docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (n=1233), and risk of recurrence (C) or breast cancer mortality (D) in 11 386 patients on sequential anthracycline and taxane (n=5722) versus higher cumulative dose docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (n=5664), smoothed after 5 years (denoted by dotted line). Error bars show 95% CI. O–E=observed minus expected. RR=rate ratio. V=variance. 2p=two-sided p value.
Figure 4:
Figure 4:. Subgroup analyses of recurrence with concurrent anthracycline plus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide versus same dose docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide
Subgroup analyses of first invasive recurrence of breast cancer. O–E=observed minus expected. ER=oestrogen receptor. NS=not significant. N0=node-negative. N+=node-positive. PR=progesterone receptor. 2p=two-sided p value.*99% CIs are provided for individual subgroup data; 95% CI is provided for the total data.
Figure 5:
Figure 5:. 10-year cumulative risk of recurrence with concurrent anthracycline plus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide versus same dose docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide, by oestrogen receptor and nodal status
10-year risk of any recurrence in 836 patients on concurrent anthracycline plus docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (n=417) versus same dose docetaxel plus cyclophosphamide (n=419) who were ER-negative (A) and 1633 patients (819 vs 814) who were ER-positive (B), both smoothed after 5 years (dotted line), and in 885 patients (432 vs 453) with node-negative cancer (C) and 1584 patients (804 vs 780) with node-positive cancer (D), both smoothed after 4 years (dotted line). Error bars show 95% CI. ER=oestrogen receptor. O–E=observed minus expected. RR=rate ratio. V=variance. 2p=two-sided p value.
Figure 6:
Figure 6:. 10-year cumulative risk of any recurrence and breast cancer mortality with anthracycline-based regimens with taxane versus without taxane
Risk of recurrence (A) or breast cancer mortality (B) in 11 167 patients with anthracycline plus taxane (n=5590) versus the same chemotherapy without taxane (n=5577), risk of recurrence (C) or breast cancer mortality (D) in 27 089 patients with anthracycline plus taxane (n=13 528) versus a higher (but less than double) dose of non-taxane chemotherapy (n=13 561), and risk of recurrence (E) or breast cancer mortality (F) in 14 620 patients with taxane plus anthracycline (n=7322) versus double the dose of non-taxane chemotherapy (n=7298) . Error bars show 95% CI. O–E=observed minus expected. RR=rate ratio. V=variance. 2p=two-sided p value.

Comment in

References

    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 1998; 352: 930–42. - PubMed
    1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 2005; 365: 1687–717. - PubMed
    1. Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J, et al. Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100 000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 2012; 379: 432–44. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gray R, Bradley R, Braybrooke J, et al. Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: a patient-level meta-analysis of 37 298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials. Lancet 2019; 393: 1440–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Greenlee H, Iribarren C, Rana JS, et al. Risks of cardiovascular disease in women with and without breast cancer: the Pathways Heart Study. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40: 1647–58. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms