Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1986 Mar;47(3):176-80.
doi: 10.1080/15298668691389540.

Effects of industrial respirator wear during exercise in subjects with restrictive lung disease

Comparative Study

Effects of industrial respirator wear during exercise in subjects with restrictive lung disease

T K Hodous et al. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Mar.

Abstract

Few studies have examined the response of individuals with restrictive lung disease (RLD) to respirator wear. Such information should be of theoretical and practical interest when the need to determine fitness to wear respirators is considered. Seventeen females performed progressive submaximal treadmill exercise. Twelve control subjects with total lung capacity (TLC) = 5.71 +/- .19L (mean +/- SEM) and DLCO = 25.8 +/- 1.0 mL/min/mmHg were compared to five RLD subjects with TLC = 3.70 +/- 0.22 and DLCO = 14.5 +/- 0.7. Mean age, height and weight were similar. Separate exercise trials were performed with no added resistance (NAR), and with 5 cm H2O/L/sec inspiratory and 1.5 cm H2O/L/sec expiratory resistance (R2) to stimulate widely used respiratory masks. Comparisons of exercise data were made at an oxygen consumption of 0.8 L/min. With NAR, RLD subjects had significantly higher minute ventilation (VE) (29.0 vs. 21.2 L/min for controls), higher respiratory rate (RR), and lower tidal volume (VT). Heart rate, end-tidal PCO2 (PETCO2), and mouth pressure swing (Poral) were not different from control values. With R2 compared to NAR, the controls had reduced RR and VE; and increased VT, PETCO2, and Poral. While changes with R2 for the RLD subjects were in the same directions as controls, only the increase in Poral was statistically significant. Analysis of the differences showed that none of the changes with R2 in RLD subjects was different from control changes except for the greater increase in Poral and the smaller increase in VT. The former was explained by the RLD subjects' higher VE and flow rates, and the non-linear nature of R2 at higher flow rates.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources