Mortality Prediction in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Traditional and Machine Learning Algorithms
- PMID: 37062757
- DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0221
Mortality Prediction in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using Traditional and Machine Learning Algorithms
Abstract
Abstract Prognostic prediction of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in patients is crucial in clinical decision and health care policy making. This study aimed to develop and validate prediction models for in-hospital mortality after severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI). We developed and validated logistic regression (LR), LASSO regression, and machine learning (ML) algorithms including support vector machines (SVM) and XGBoost models. Fifty-four candidate predictors were included. Model performance was expressed in terms of discrimination (C-statistic) and calibration (intercept and slope). For model development, 2804 patients with sTBI in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) China Registry study were included. External validation was performed in 1113 patients with sTBI in the CENTER-TBI European Registry study. XGBoost achieved high discrimination in mortality prediction, and it outperformed logistic and LASSO regression. The XGBoost model established in this study also outperformed prediction models currently available, including the International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) core and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (CRASH) basic models. When including 54 variables, XGBoost and SVM reached C-statistics of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-0.92) and 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79-0.90) at internal validation, and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.87-0.88) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.85-0.87) at external validation, respectively. A simplified version of XGBoost and SVM using 26 variables selected by recursive feature elimination (RFE) reached C-statistics of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.92) and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.91) at internal validation, and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.87-0.88) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.86-0.87) at external validation, respectively. However, when the number of variables included decreased, the difference between ML and LR diminished. All the prediction models can be accessed via a web-based calculator. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, age, pupillary light reflex, Injury Severity Score (ISS) for brain region, and the presence of acute subdural hematoma were the five strongest predictors for mortality prediction. The study showed that ML techniques such as XGBoost may capture information hidden in demographic and clinical predictors of patients with sTBI and yield more precise predictions compared with LR approaches.
Keywords: extreme gradient boosting; logistic regression; machine learning; prognostic model; traumatic brain injury.
Similar articles
-
Machine learning algorithms performed no better than regression models for prognostication in traumatic brain injury.J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:95-107. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 20. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020. PMID: 32201256
-
Performance of the IMPACT and CRASH prognostic models for traumatic brain injury in a contemporary multicenter cohort: a TRACK-TBI study.J Neurosurg. 2024 Mar 15;141(2):417-429. doi: 10.3171/2023.11.JNS231425. Print 2024 Aug 1. J Neurosurg. 2024. PMID: 38489823 Free PMC article.
-
XGBoost Machine Learning Algorism Performed Better Than Regression Models in Predicting Mortality of Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.World Neurosurg. 2022 Jul;163:e617-e622. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.044. Epub 2022 Apr 14. World Neurosurg. 2022. PMID: 35430400
-
Prognosis in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Models and Validation Studies.J Neurotrauma. 2020 Jan 1;37(1):1-13. doi: 10.1089/neu.2019.6401. Epub 2019 Aug 5. J Neurotrauma. 2020. PMID: 31099301
-
Machine learning algorithms for predicting outcomes of traumatic brain injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Neurol Int. 2023 Jul 28;14:262. doi: 10.25259/SNI_312_2023. eCollection 2023. Surg Neurol Int. 2023. PMID: 37560584 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Feasibility study on intracranial pressure and prognosis of patients with moderate and severe craniocerebral injury using the Rotterdam computed tomography score: an observational study.Front Neurol. 2025 Mar 26;16:1554181. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1554181. eCollection 2025. Front Neurol. 2025. PMID: 40206288 Free PMC article.
-
Developing practical machine learning survival models to identify high-risk patients for in-hospital mortality following traumatic brain injury.Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 18;15(1):5913. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89574-0. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39966448 Free PMC article.
-
Platelet Contribution and Endothelial Activation and Stress Index-Potential Mortality Predictors in Traumatic Brain Injury.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 16;25(14):7763. doi: 10.3390/ijms25147763. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39063005 Free PMC article.
-
Utilizing ultra-early continuous physiologic data to develop automated measures of clinical severity in a traumatic brain injury population.Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 31;14(1):7618. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57538-5. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38556518 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a clinical nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury prehospital: A retrospective study.Heliyon. 2024 Aug 31;10(17):e37295. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37295. eCollection 2024 Sep 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39296141 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical