Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;11(4):371-382.
doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12389. Epub 2023 Apr 16.

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease is associated with acute pancreatitis with more severe course: Post hoc analysis of a prospectively collected international registry

Collaborators, Affiliations

Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease is associated with acute pancreatitis with more severe course: Post hoc analysis of a prospectively collected international registry

Szilárd Váncsa et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 May.

Abstract

Introduction: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a proven risk factor for acute pancreatitis (AP). However, NAFLD has recently been redefined as metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). In this post hoc analysis, we quantified the effect of MAFLD on the outcomes of AP.

Methods: We identified our patients from the multicentric, prospective International Acute Pancreatitis Registry of the Hungarian Pancreatic Study Group. Next, we compared AP patients with and without MAFLD and the individual components of MAFLD regarding in-hospital mortality and AP severity based on the revised Atlanta classification. Lastly, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: MAFLD had a high prevalence in AP, 39% (801/2053). MAFLD increased the odds of moderate-to-severe AP (OR = 1.43, CI: 1.09-1.89). However, the odds of in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.89, CI: 0.42-1.89) and severe AP (OR = 1.70, CI: 0.97-3.01) were not higher in the MAFLD group. Out of the three diagnostic criteria of MAFLD, the highest odds of severe AP was in the group based on metabolic risk abnormalities (OR = 2.68, CI: 1.39-5.09). In addition, the presence of one, two, and three diagnostic criteria dose-dependently increased the odds of moderate-to-severe AP (OR = 1.23, CI: 0.88-1.70, OR = 1.38, CI: 0.93-2.04, and OR = 3.04, CI: 1.63-5.70, respectively) and severe AP (OR = 1.13, CI: 0.54-2.27, OR = 2.08, CI: 0.97-4.35, and OR = 4.76, CI: 1.50-15.4, respectively). Furthermore, in patients with alcohol abuse and aged ≥60 years, the effect of MAFLD became insignificant.

Conclusions: MAFLD is associated with AP severity, which varies based on the components of its diagnostic criteria. Furthermore, MAFLD shows a dose-dependent effect on the outcomes of AP.

Keywords: MAFLD; NAFLD; acute pancreatitis; metabolic syndrome; metabolic-associated fatty liver disease; mortality; non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; prognosis; severity; steatosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Patient selection flowchart.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Summary figure showing the rate of in‐hospital mortality, severity, local complications, acute peripancreatic fluid collection, pancreatic necrosis, and pseudocysts based on the different MAFLD groups. Colors for severity show mild (green), moderate (yellow), and severe (red) acute pancreatitis. MAFLD, metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease. *, **, *** represents p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Summary figure showing the rate of systemic complications, renal failure, respiratory failure, cardiovascular failure, and diabetes as a complication, and the boxplots for the length of hospital stay and maximum C‐reactive protein based on the different MAFLD groups. MAFLD, metabolic‐associated fatty liver disease. *, **, *** represents p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.001, respectively.

Comment in

References

    1. Xiao AY, Tan ML, Wu LM, Asrani VM, Windsor JA, Yadav D, et al. Global incidence and mortality of pancreatic diseases: a systematic review, meta‐analysis, and meta‐regression of population‐based cohort studies. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1(1):45–55. 10.1016/s2468-1253(16)30004-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Párniczky A, Kui B, Szentesi A, Balázs A, Szűcs Á, Mosztbacher D, et al. Prospective, multicentre, nationwide clinical data from 600 cases of acute pancreatitis. PLoS One. 2016;11(10):e0165309. 10.1371/journal.pone.0165309 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. IAP/APA evidence‐based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2013;13(4 Suppl 2):e1–e15. - PubMed
    1. Szakács Z, Gede N, Pécsi D, Izbéki F, Papp M, Kovács G, et al. Aging and comorbidities in acute pancreatitis II.: a cohort‐analysis of 1203 prospectively collected cases. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1776. 10.3389/fphys.2018.01776 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dobszai D, Mátrai P, Gyöngyi Z, Csupor D, Bajor J, Erőss B, et al. Body‐mass index correlates with severity and mortality in acute pancreatitis: a meta‐analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(6):729–43. 10.3748/wjg.v25.i6.729 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms