Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 10;7(2):e241.
doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000241. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Sulfur dioxide reduction at coal-fired power plants in North Carolina and associations with preterm birth among surrounding residents

Affiliations

Sulfur dioxide reduction at coal-fired power plants in North Carolina and associations with preterm birth among surrounding residents

Adrien A Wilkie et al. Environ Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Coal-fired power plants (CFPP) are major contributors of air pollution, including the majority of anthropogenic sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions, which have been associated with preterm birth (PTB). To address a 2002 North Carolina (NC) policy, 14 of the largest NC CFPPs either installed desulfurization equipment (scrubbers) or retired coal units, resulting in substantial reductions of SO2 air emissions. We investigated whether SO2 air emission reduction strategies at CFPPs in NC were associated with changes in prevalence of PTB in nearby communities.

Methods: We used US EPA Air Markets Program Data to track SO2 emissions and determine the implementation dates of intervention at CFPPs and geocoded 2003-2015 NC singleton live births. We conducted a difference-in-difference analysis to estimate change in PTB associated with change in SO2 reduction strategies for populations living 0-<4 and 4-<10 miles from CFPPs pre- and postintervention, with a comparison of those living 10-<15 miles from CFPPs.

Results: With the spatial-temporal exposure restrictions applied, 42,231 and 41,218 births were within 15 miles of CFPP-scrubbers and CFPP-retired groups, respectively. For residents within 4-<10 miles from a CFPP, we estimated that the absolute prevalence of PTB decreased by -1.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): -2.6, -0.4] associated with scrubber installation and -0.5% (95% CI: -1.6, 0.6) associated with the retirement of coal units at CFPPs. Our findings were imprecise and generally null-to-positive among those living within 0-<4 miles regardless of the intervention type.

Conclusions: Results suggest a reduction of PTB among residents 4-<10 miles of the CFPPs that installed scrubbers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with regard to the content of this report.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Location of the 14 North Carolina coal-fired power plants included in this study characterized by their 2003 capacity, intervention strategy, and operating status as of 31 December 2015. CFPP indicates coal-fired power plant; MW, megawatt; NG, natural gas.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Monthly SO2 emissions reported by 14 coal-fired power plants in North Carolina (2002–2015). A, Summed monthly SO2 emissions grouped by CFPP-scrubber and CFPP-retired. B, CFPP-scrubber (left) and CFPP-retired (right) monthly SO2 emissions grouped by 1-year LMP exposure window pre- and postintervention. (Data source: US EPA’s AMPD.) CFPP indicates coal-fired power plant; LMP, last menstrual period; SO2, sulfur dioxide.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean difference and 95% confidence intervals in the proportion of preterm birth by distance in miles from coal-fired power plants. Mean difference = postintervention minus preintervention. A) CFPP-scrubber cohort. B) CFPP-retired cohort. C) CFPP-all cohort. *For <1 mile from CFPP-all and CFPP-scrubber, the 95% CIs extend past the shown y axis due to small numbers of observations (−9.4 to 11.3 and −15.3 to 12.4, respectively). For <1 mile from CFPP-retired, the mean difference and 95% CI could not be calculated because no cases of PTB occurred within that distance. CFPP indicates coal-fired power plant; PTB, preterm birth; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Absolute difference in proportions of preterm birth pre-intervention versus post-intervention to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions at coal-fired power plants in North Carolina. Overall results: A, D, G. Stratified by early and moderate-to-late PTB: B, E, H. Stratified by gestational parent race/ethnicity: C, F, I. Top row (A–C) shows CFPP-scrubber cohort results. Middle row (D–F) shows CFPP-retired cohort results. Bottom row (G–I) shows CFPP-all cohort results. No results provided for Asian, nH in (F) and (I) because models did not converge. Distance categories are 0 miles to less than 4 miles (circles) and 4 miles to less than 10 miles (triangles), compared with 10 miles to less than 15 miles. CFPP indicates coal-fired power plant; DiD, difference-in-differences; nH, non-Hispanic; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bi X. “Cleansing the air at the expense of waterways?” Empirical evidence from the toxic releases of coal-fired power plants in the United States. J Regul Econ. 2017;51:18–40.
    1. Massetti EB. Environmental Quality and the U.S. Power Sector: Air Quality, Water Quality, Land Use and Environmental Justice. Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States). Building Technologies Research and Integration Center (BTRIC); 2017.
    1. Wang Z, Cowan EA, Seramur KC, et al. . Legacy of coal combustion: widespread contamination of lake sediments and implications for chronic risks to aquatic ecosystems. Environ Sci Technol. 2022;56:14723–14733. - PubMed
    1. U.S. EPA. Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for Sulfur Oxides – Health Criteria (Final Report, Dec 2017). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-17/451, 2017. Available at: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/isa/recordisplay.cfm?deid=338596. Accessed 26 December 2022.
    1. U.S. EPA. Integrated Science Assessment (ISA) for Particulate Matter (Final Report, Dec 2019). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-19/188, 2019. Available at: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/isa/recordisplay.cfm?deid=347534. Accessed 26 December 2022.