Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 11;15(4):e37454.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.37454. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Results of Endometrial Sampling in a Tertiary Hospital

Alev Esercan  1 , Ismail Demir  1 , Ipek Eskiyoruk  1 , Omer Geckil  1
Affiliations

Results of Endometrial Sampling in a Tertiary Hospital

Alev Esercan et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to investigate the results of endometrial sampling in a tertiary hospital according to age and symptoms.

Materials and methods: A total of 505 patients who underwent endometrial sampling due to various reasons in our tertiary hospital in the last six months were included in our study, and the pathological results of endometrial sampling were analyzed retrospectively.

Results: The mean age of 505 patients was 45.03 + 7.40 (19-74) years, and 91.5% of the indications were premenopausal abnormal uterine bleeding and 8.5% were postmenopausal bleeding. The most common pathological result of all age groups was proliferative endometrium (37.6%), and the least was the endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (0.2%). In 9.3% of patients, the result was insufficient material. Of the patients, 88.7% had no additional organic pathology. A total of 30 (5.9%) patients have undergone surgery after endometrial sampling.

Conclusion: It should be kept in mind that despite the pathological result may be insufficient rarely, endometrial sampling should be performed as the first choice in abnormal uterine bleeding.

Keywords: dilatation and curettage; endometrial carcinoma; endometrial polyp; endometrial sampling; insufficient material.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. A systematic review evaluating health-related quality of life, work impairment, and health-care costs and utilization in abnormal uterine bleeding. Liu Z, Doan QV, Blumenthal P, Dubois RW. Value Health. 2007;10:183–194. - PubMed
    1. The FIGO recommendations on terminologies and definitions for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding. Fraser IS, Critchley HO, Broder M, Munro MG. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29:383–390. - PubMed
    1. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;113:3–13. - PubMed
    1. Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic quantitative review. Clark TJ, Mann CH, Shah N, Khan KS, Song F, Gupta JK. BJOG. 2002;109:313–321. - PubMed
    1. Practice Bulletin No. 149: endometrial cancer. Committee on Practice Bulletins. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:1006–1026. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources