Continuation Rates of the Etonogestrel Implant and Factors Associated With Early Discontinuation
- PMID: 37065304
- PMCID: PMC10102878
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.36117
Continuation Rates of the Etonogestrel Implant and Factors Associated With Early Discontinuation
Abstract
Background: The etonogestrel implant is generally considered an effective, three-year, long-acting reversible contraceptive device. Previous research, such as the landmark CHOICE study, has reported a one-year continuation rate of 72% to 84%, however, in a real-world setting these rates may be significantly lower.
Objective: To study etonogestrel implant continuation rates and factors associated with early discontinuation in a specific clinical setting.
Study design: Single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients who received the etonogestrel implant between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, at several practices at an academic community hospital network. Records were reviewed up to three years after implant insertion to determine continuation rates (one to three years), early discontinuation rates (≤12 months), and reasons for early discontinuation. A sample size calculation was performed to guide a subanalysis of side effects.
Results: A total of 774 patients underwent etonogestrel insertion during the study period. The one-year continuation rate was lower than that of the CHOICE study (62% vs. 83%, P <0.001). A subanalysis (n=216) revealed that a majority (82%, n=177) of patients reported side effects. Side effects were more common in patients with early discontinuation compared with patients who continued use longer than one year (93% vs. 71%, P <0.001). The most common side effect, abnormal uterine bleeding, was not significantly associated with early discontinuation. A significant association (P=0.02) was found between early discontinuation and neurologic/psychiatric complaints.
Conclusions: The one-year continuation rate of the etonogestrel implant in our population is significantly lower than the value reported by CHOICE. Implant side effects are common and significantly affect rates of discontinuation. Our data suggest there is an opportunity for education and counseling for individuals opting for this method of long-acting contraception.
Keywords: abnormal uterine bleeding; contraception; etonogestrel implant; long-acting contraception; side effects; unplanned pregnancy.
Copyright © 2023, Hines et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Immediate postpartum etonogestrel implant: a contraception option with long-term continuation.Contraception. 2014 Sep;90(3):259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 14. Contraception. 2014. PMID: 24993485
-
The association between BMI and continuity of etonogestrel (ENG)-releasing implant.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024 Oct;167(1):254-258. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15590. Epub 2024 May 7. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 38712353
-
The effect of immediate postpartum compared to delayed postpartum and interval etonogestrel contraceptive implant insertion on removal rates for bleeding.Contraception. 2014 Sep;90(3):253-8. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.05.010. Epub 2014 May 24. Contraception. 2014. PMID: 24973904
-
Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter-term hormonal methods of contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 23;4(4):CD004317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004317.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31013349 Free PMC article.
-
Long-acting reversible contraception immediately after medical abortion: systematic review with meta-analyses.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Feb 28;26(2):141-160. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz040. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 32096862
References
-
- Long-acting reversible contraception. Baker CC, Creinin MD. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140:883–897. - PubMed
-
- Practice bulletin no. 186: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Work Group. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:0–69. - PubMed
-
- Committee opinion no. 642: increasing access to contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy. [ Jul; 2022 ];Obstet Gynecol. 2015 126:0–8. - PubMed
-
- Organon. (2022) Organon. [ Aug; 2022 ]. 2022. http://nexplanon.com http://nexplanon.com
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources