Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 31;15(3):1228-1235.
doi: 10.21037/jtd-22-1316. Epub 2023 Mar 10.

Esophageal stenting with minimally-invasive surgical intervention for delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation

Chien-Hung Chiu  1 , Osbert Qi Yao Leow  1 , Yu-Chao Wang  2 , Wei-Hsun Chen  1 , Hsin-Yueh Fang  1 , Yin-Kai Chao  1 , Jules Lin  3
Affiliations

Esophageal stenting with minimally-invasive surgical intervention for delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation

Chien-Hung Chiu et al. J Thorac Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Spontaneous esophageal perforation is a challenging surgical emergency with significant morbidity and mortality, and timely primary repair carries good outcomes. However, direct repair for a delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation is not always feasible and is associated with high mortality. Esophageal stenting can provide therapeutic benefits in the management of esophageal perforations. In this study, we review our experience with placing esophageal stents in combination with minimally-invasive surgical drainage to treat delayed spontaneous esophageal perforations.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with delayed spontaneous esophageal perforations between September 2018 and March 2021. All patients were treated using a hybrid approach, including esophageal stenting across the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) to reduce continued contamination, gastric decompression with extraluminal sutures to prevent stent migration, early enteral nutrition, and aggressive minimally-invasive thoracoscopic debridement and drainage of infected material.

Results: There were 5 patients with delayed spontaneous esophageal perforation treated with this hybrid approach. The mean duration between symptoms and diagnosis was 5 days, and the interval between symptoms and esophageal stent insertion was 7 days. The median time to oral nutrition and to esophageal stent removal was 43 and 66 days. There was no stent migration or hospital mortality. Three patients (60%) had postoperative complications. All patients were successfully resumed on oral nutrition with esophageal preservation.

Conclusions: A hybrid approach combining endoscopic esophageal stent placement with extraluminal sutures to prevent stent migration, thoracoscopic decortication with chest tube drainage, gastric decompression, and jejunostomy tube placement for early nutrition was feasible and effective in the treatment of delayed spontaneous esophageal perforations. This technique offers a less invasive treatment approach for a challenging clinical problem which has traditionally carried a high rate of morbidity and mortality.

Keywords: Esophageal stenting; delayed esophageal perforation; esophageal perforation; spontaneous esophageal perforation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-22-1316/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Esophagogram showing (A) a distal esophageal perforation at initial diagnosis, (B) no leak from the esophageal perforation after esophageal stent placement, and (C) a healed esophageal perforation after stent removal.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CT imaging showing pneumomediastinum and bilateral pleural effusions consistent with an esophageal perforation. CT, computed tomography.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Thoracoscopic view showing an esophageal perforation (arrow) and necrotic tissue in the mediastinum and pleural cavity.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Endoscopic view showing fixation of the esophageal stent to the esophageal mucosa using absorbable suture (arrow).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Teh E, Edwards J, Duffy J, et al. Boerhaave's syndrome: a review of management and outcome. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2007;6:640-3. 10.1510/icvts.2007.151936 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaker H, Elsayed H, Whittle I, et al. The influence of the 'golden 24-h rule' on the prognosis of oesophageal perforation in the modern era. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010;38:216-22. 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.01.030 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muir AD, White J, McGuigan JA, et al. Treatment and outcomes of oesophageal perforation in a tertiary referral centre. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:799-804; discussion 804. 10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00050-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fischer A, Thomusch O, Benz S, et al. Nonoperative treatment of 15 benign esophageal perforations with self-expandable covered metal stents. Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:467-72. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.08.047 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hindy P, Hong J, Lam-Tsai Y, et al. A comprehensive review of esophageal stents. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 2012;8:526-34. - PMC - PubMed