Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 22;2(4):pgad094.
doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad094. eCollection 2023 Apr.

The Spot the Troll Quiz game increases accuracy in discerning between real and inauthentic social media accounts

Affiliations

The Spot the Troll Quiz game increases accuracy in discerning between real and inauthentic social media accounts

Jeffrey Lees et al. PNAS Nexus. .

Abstract

The proliferation of political mis/disinformation on social media has led many scholars to embrace "inoculation" techniques, where individuals are trained to identify the signs of low-veracity information prior to exposure. Coordinated information operations frequently spread mis/disinformation through inauthentic or "troll" accounts that appear to be trustworthy members to the targeted polity, as in Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 US presidential election. We experimentally tested the efficacy of inoculation against inauthentic online actors, using the Spot the Troll Quiz, a free, online educational tool that teaches how to spot markers of inauthenticity. Inoculation works in this setting. Across an online US nationally representative sample (N = 2,847), which also oversampled older adults, we find that taking the Spot the Troll Quiz (vs. playing a simple game) significantly increases participants' accuracy in identifying trolls among a set of Twitter accounts that are novel to participants. This inoculation also reduces participants' self-efficacy in identifying inauthentic accounts and reduced the perceived reliability of fake news headlines, although it had no effect on affective polarization. And while accuracy in the novel troll-spotting task is negatively associated with age and Republican party identification, the Quiz is equally effective on older adults and Republicans as it was on younger adults and Democrats. In the field, a convenience set of Twitter users who posted their Spot the Troll Quiz results in the fall of 2020 (N = 505) reduced their rate of retweeting in the period after the Quiz, with no impact on original tweeting.

Keywords: Twitter; disinformation; inoculation; misinformation; social media; trolls.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Image of the top section of a profile (one of eight) that Quiz takers are asked to read and then guess whether the profile is real or a troll account. Users could scroll down to see several more tweets not visible in Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The message Quiz takers get after (correctly) identifying this profile as a troll. The subsequent “signs” page provides Quiz takers with detailed visual information regarding what in this profile served as evidence it was a troll account.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Plot of standardized OLS regression estimates from the models testing the stated hypotheses. The top row displays the condition effect of Quiz vs. control on the dependent variables, and the bottom row displays the fixed effect partisan difference for Republicans vs. Democrats in the models testing for condition effects. Bars at 95% CI. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Total tweets, original tweets, and retweets per day, relative to 6+ days before Quiz. Coefficients and 95% CI from three separate panel regressions including day and account fixed effects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lees J, McCarter A, Sarno DM. 2022. Twitter's disputed tags may be ineffective at reducing belief in fake news and only reduce intentions to share fake news among Democrats and Independents. J Online Trust Saf. 1(3):1–20.
    1. Thorson E. 2016. Belief echoes: the persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Polit Commun. 33(3):460–480.
    1. Traberg CS, Roozenbeek J, van der Linden S. 2022. Psychological inoculation against misinformation: current evidence and future directions. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 700(1):136–151.
    1. Banas JA. 2020. Inoculation theory. In: The international encyclopedia of media psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 1–8.
    1. Compton J. 2013. Inoculation theory. In: Dillard JP, Shen L, editors. The SAGE handbook of persuasion: developments in theory and practice. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. p. 220–236.