The Spot the Troll Quiz game increases accuracy in discerning between real and inauthentic social media accounts
- PMID: 37065618
- PMCID: PMC10096901
- DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad094
The Spot the Troll Quiz game increases accuracy in discerning between real and inauthentic social media accounts
Abstract
The proliferation of political mis/disinformation on social media has led many scholars to embrace "inoculation" techniques, where individuals are trained to identify the signs of low-veracity information prior to exposure. Coordinated information operations frequently spread mis/disinformation through inauthentic or "troll" accounts that appear to be trustworthy members to the targeted polity, as in Russia's attempts to influence the 2016 US presidential election. We experimentally tested the efficacy of inoculation against inauthentic online actors, using the Spot the Troll Quiz, a free, online educational tool that teaches how to spot markers of inauthenticity. Inoculation works in this setting. Across an online US nationally representative sample (N = 2,847), which also oversampled older adults, we find that taking the Spot the Troll Quiz (vs. playing a simple game) significantly increases participants' accuracy in identifying trolls among a set of Twitter accounts that are novel to participants. This inoculation also reduces participants' self-efficacy in identifying inauthentic accounts and reduced the perceived reliability of fake news headlines, although it had no effect on affective polarization. And while accuracy in the novel troll-spotting task is negatively associated with age and Republican party identification, the Quiz is equally effective on older adults and Republicans as it was on younger adults and Democrats. In the field, a convenience set of Twitter users who posted their Spot the Troll Quiz results in the fall of 2020 (N = 505) reduced their rate of retweeting in the period after the Quiz, with no impact on original tweeting.
Keywords: Twitter; disinformation; inoculation; misinformation; social media; trolls.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of National Academy of Sciences.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Exposing influence campaigns in the age of LLMs: a behavioral-based AI approach to detecting state-sponsored trolls.EPJ Data Sci. 2023;12(1):46. doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00423-4. Epub 2023 Oct 9. EPJ Data Sci. 2023. PMID: 37822355 Free PMC article.
-
Troll and divide: the language of online polarization.PNAS Nexus. 2022 Mar 10;1(1):pgac019. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac019. eCollection 2022 Mar. PNAS Nexus. 2022. PMID: 36712799 Free PMC article.
-
Constituents' Inferences of Local Governments' Goals and the Relationship Between Political Party and Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation: Cross-sectional Survey of Twitter Followers of State Public Health Departments.JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Feb 10;2(1):e29246. doi: 10.2196/29246. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun. JMIR Infodemiology. 2022. PMID: 37113808 Free PMC article.
-
Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review.Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023;13(1):30. doi: 10.1007/s13278-023-01028-5. Epub 2023 Feb 9. Soc Netw Anal Min. 2023. PMID: 36789378 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Coordinated inauthentic behavior: An innovative manipulation tactic to amplify COVID-19 anti-vaccine communication outreach via social media.Front Sociol. 2023 Mar 16;8:1141416. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1141416. eCollection 2023. Front Sociol. 2023. PMID: 37006634 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
How to "inoculate" against multimodal misinformation: A conceptual replication of Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2020).Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 25;13(1):18273. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43885-2. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37880245 Free PMC article.
-
Inoculation hesitancy: an exploration of challenges in scaling inoculation theory.R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Jun 26;11(6):231711. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231711. eCollection 2024 Jun. R Soc Open Sci. 2024. PMID: 39100154 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological inoculation improves resilience to and reduces willingness to share vaccine misinformation.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 18;15(1):29830. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09462-5. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40820144 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Assessing inoculation's effectiveness in motivating resistance to conspiracy propaganda in Finnish and United States samples.Front Psychol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1416722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1416722. eCollection 2024. Front Psychol. 2024. PMID: 39144606 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lees J, McCarter A, Sarno DM. 2022. Twitter's disputed tags may be ineffective at reducing belief in fake news and only reduce intentions to share fake news among Democrats and Independents. J Online Trust Saf. 1(3):1–20.
-
- Thorson E. 2016. Belief echoes: the persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Polit Commun. 33(3):460–480.
-
- Traberg CS, Roozenbeek J, van der Linden S. 2022. Psychological inoculation against misinformation: current evidence and future directions. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 700(1):136–151.
-
- Banas JA. 2020. Inoculation theory. In: The international encyclopedia of media psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. p. 1–8.
-
- Compton J. 2013. Inoculation theory. In: Dillard JP, Shen L, editors. The SAGE handbook of persuasion: developments in theory and practice. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. p. 220–236.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources