Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2023 Mar 29:10:1066622.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1066622. eCollection 2023.

Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series

Affiliations
Case Reports

Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series

Ye Liu et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for the treatment of apical prolapse. Because intraoperative exposure of the sacrospinous ligament is difficult, SSLF is difficult. The aim of our article is to determine the safety and feasibility of single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic SSLF for apical prolapse.

Methods: This single-center, single-surgeon case series study included 9 patients with pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) III or IV apical prolapse who underwent single-port laparoscopic SSLF. Additionally, transobturator tension-free vaginal tap (TVT-O) was performed in 2 patients, and anterior pelvic mesh reconstruction was performed in 1 patient.

Results: The operative time ranged from 75 to 105 (mean, 88.9 ± 10.2) min, and blood loss ranged from 25 to 100 (mean, 43.3 ± 22.6) ml. No serious operative complications, blood transfusions, visceral injuries, or postoperative gluteal pain were reported for these patients. After 2-4 months of follow-up, no recurrence of POP, gluteal pain, urinary retention/incontinence, or other complications was observed.

Conclusion: Transvaginal single-port SSLF is a safe, effective, and easy-to-master operation for apical prolapse.

Keywords: POP; sacrospinous ligament fixation; single-port laparoscopy; transvaginal; video.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Placement of single-port devices. The laparoscopic incision protector was placed inside the posterior vaginal wall incision and made contact with the tissues..
Figure 2
Figure 2
Sacrospinous ligament exposure. An ultrasonic scalpel was used to laparoscopically separate the loose tissues next to the rectum until the sacrospinous ligament, the adjacent piriformis, and iliococcygeal muscles were fully exposed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Sacrospinous ligament suturing. The right sacrospinous ligament was sutured with a nonabsorbable suture using a circular needle (O1/2 10 × 20) approximately 2 cm from the ischial spine at a depth of ≤0.3 cm.

Similar articles

References

    1. Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, Breart G, Ringa V. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol. (2009) 113(3):609–16. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181985312 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu JM, Hundley AF, Fulton RG, Myers ER. Forecasting the prevalence of pelvic floor disorders in U.S. women: 2010 to 2050. Obstet Gynecol. (2009) 114(6):1278–83. 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181c2ce96 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Thom DH, Van den Eeden S, Vittinghoff E. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2002) 186(4):712–6. 10.1067/mob.2002.121897 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sederl J. Surgery in prolapse of a blind-end vagina. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. (1958) 18(6):824–8. - PubMed
    1. Petri E, Ashok K. Sacrospinous vaginal fixation–current status. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. (2011) 90(5):429–36. 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01084.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types