Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series
- PMID: 37065998
- PMCID: PMC10090387
- DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1066622
Case report: Transvaginal single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament fixation for apical prolapse: A single-center case series
Abstract
Background: Sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) is a minimally invasive and effective procedure for the treatment of apical prolapse. Because intraoperative exposure of the sacrospinous ligament is difficult, SSLF is difficult. The aim of our article is to determine the safety and feasibility of single-port extraperitoneal laparoscopic SSLF for apical prolapse.
Methods: This single-center, single-surgeon case series study included 9 patients with pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) III or IV apical prolapse who underwent single-port laparoscopic SSLF. Additionally, transobturator tension-free vaginal tap (TVT-O) was performed in 2 patients, and anterior pelvic mesh reconstruction was performed in 1 patient.
Results: The operative time ranged from 75 to 105 (mean, 88.9 ± 10.2) min, and blood loss ranged from 25 to 100 (mean, 43.3 ± 22.6) ml. No serious operative complications, blood transfusions, visceral injuries, or postoperative gluteal pain were reported for these patients. After 2-4 months of follow-up, no recurrence of POP, gluteal pain, urinary retention/incontinence, or other complications was observed.
Conclusion: Transvaginal single-port SSLF is a safe, effective, and easy-to-master operation for apical prolapse.
Keywords: POP; sacrospinous ligament fixation; single-port laparoscopy; transvaginal; video.
© 2023 Liu, Wang, Wang, Yan, Chu and Chen.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Sacrospinous fixation versus uterosacral ligament suspension in managing apical prolapse.World J Urol. 2025 Mar 20;43(1):182. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05563-y. World J Urol. 2025. PMID: 40111511
-
Single-port laparoscopic sacrospinous ligament suspension via the natural vaginal cavity (SvNOTES) for pelvic prolapse: The first feasibility study.Front Surg. 2022 Jul 18;9:911553. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.911553. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2022. PMID: 35923438 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes of the anterior approach versus posterior sacrospinous ligament fixation for pelvic organ prolapse.Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1857-1862. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05171-z. Epub 2022 Mar 28. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. PMID: 35347369
-
Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Apr;43(4):511-523.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 3. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021. PMID: 33548503
-
Anterior bilateral sacrospinous ligament fixation with concomitant anterior native tissue repair: a pilot study.Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Dec;33(12):3519-3527. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05092-x. Epub 2022 Feb 28. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. PMID: 35226145 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Sederl J. Surgery in prolapse of a blind-end vagina. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. (1958) 18(6):824–8. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous