Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 17;18(1):51.
doi: 10.1007/s11657-023-01241-x.

Hip fracture registries in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Affiliations

Hip fracture registries in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review

Roberto Klappenbach et al. Arch Osteoporos. .

Abstract

Purpose: The study aims to identify, describe, and organize the currently available evidence regarding hip fracture (HF) registries in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Methods: We conducted a scoping review adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. We searched MEDLINE (PubMed), Google Scholar, Global Index Medicus, websites related to HF, and study references for eligible studies. Two reviewers independently performed the study selection and data extraction, including studies describing the use of individual patient records with the aim to improve the quality of care in older people with HF in LMICs.

Results: A total of 222 abstracts were screened, 59 full-text articles were reviewed, and 10 studies regarding 3 registries were included in the analysis. Malaysia and Mexico implemented a HF registry in public hospitals whereas Argentina implemented a registry in the private setting. The Mexican registry, the most recent one, is the only one that publishes annual reports. There was significant variability in data fields between registries, particularly in functional evaluation and follow-up. The Ministry of Health finances the Malaysian registry, while Argentinian and Mexican registries founding was unclear.

Conclusion: The adoption of HF registries in LMICs is scarce. The few experiences show promising results but higher support is required to develop more registries. Long-term sustainability remains a challenge.

Keywords: Aged; Developing countries; Hip fractures; Osteoporosis; Quality improvement; Registries.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cooper C, Cole ZA, Holroyd CR et al (2011) Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 22(5):1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1601-6 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2(6):285–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01623184 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cauley JA, Chalhoub D, Kassem AM, Fuleihan GEH (2014) Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10(6):338–351. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2014.51 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Papadimitriou N, Tsilidis KK, Orfanos P et al (2017) Burden of hip fracture using disability-adjusted life-years: a pooled analysis of prospective cohorts in the CHANCES consortium. Lancet Public Health 2(5):e239–e246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30046-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(12):1726–1733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources