COVID-19 lockdown revisionism
- PMID: 37068803
- PMCID: PMC10110335
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.221543
COVID-19 lockdown revisionism
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: Blake Murdoch reports a role as privacy officer of CANImmunize. Timothy Caulfield is represented by Speakers’ Spotlight. No other competing interests were declared.
References
-
- Herby J, Jonung L, Hanke SH. A literature review and meta-analysis of the effects of lockdowns on COVID-19 mortality. Studies in Applied Economics 2022;200:1–62.
-
- Banholzer N, Lison A, Vach W. Comment on ‘A literature review and meta-analysis of the effects of lock-downs on COVID-19 mortality’. [preprint] SSRN 2022. Mar. 21. doi: :https://ssrn.com/abstract=4032477.
-
- COVID-19 government response tracker. Oxford (UK): University of Oxford. Available: https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/covid-19-government-response-tracker (accessed 2023 Mar. 20).
-
- Middelkoop W. It’s official. WEF explains: COVID lockdowns, social distancing, contact tracing was a “test” to see if we will accept the “social responsibility” of “tracking personal carbon emissions”. Twitter 2022. Oct. 1. Available: https://twitter.com/wmiddelkoop/status/1576080309635923968?s=20&t=ooAUBD... (accessed 2023 Mar. 20).
-
- Poilievre P. COVID has become a never-ending excuse for power-hungry authorities to replace our freedom with their control. Enough. Reopen our businesses, let our truckers drive and restore freedom for all. Twitter 2022. Jan. 23. Available: https://twitter.com/PierrePoilievre/status/1485454969444737025?s=20 (accessed 2023 Mar. 20).
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical