Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Apr 17;408(1):152.
doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02891-8.

Major and minor complications in Veress needle (VN) and direct trocar insertion (DTI) for laparoscopic closed-entry techniques: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

C Taliento  1 , G Pontrelli  2 , A Rondoni  3 , M Desgro  2 , M Steinkasserer  4 , G Scutiero  3 , G Vizzielli  5 , P Greco  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Major and minor complications in Veress needle (VN) and direct trocar insertion (DTI) for laparoscopic closed-entry techniques: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

C Taliento et al. Langenbecks Arch Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: Direct insertion of the trocar is an alternative method to Veress needle insertion for the creation of pneumoperitoneum. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare these two entry closed techniques.

Data source: A systematic review of the literature was done on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and EBSCO.

Methods: The literature search was constructed until May 01, 2022, around search terms for "Veress," "direct trocar," "needle," "insertion," and "laparoscopic ways of entry." This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA Statement 2020.

Results: Sixteen controlled trials (RCTs) and 5 observational studies were included in the systematic review. We found no significant differences in the risk of major complication during the access manoeuvres between DTI and VN: bowel injuries (OR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.24-2.36, P = 0.63), major vascular injuries (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 0.56-5.38, P = 0.34), port site hernia (OR = 2.41, 95% CI: 0.28-20.71, P = 0.42). DTI has a lower risk of minor complications such as subcutaneous emphysema (OR = 5.19 95% CI: 2.27-11.87, P < 0.0001), extraperitoneal insufflation (OR = 5.93 95% CI: 1.69-20.87, P = 0.006), omental emphysema (OR = 18.41, 95% CI: 7. 01-48.34, P < 0.00001), omental bleeding (OR = 2.32, 95% CI: 1.18-4.55, P = 0.01), and lower number of unsuccessful entry or insufflation attempts (OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.05-4.81, P = 0.04). No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of time required to achieve complete insufflation (MD = - 15.53, 95% CI: - 91.32 to 60.27, P = 0.69), trocar site bleeding (OR = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.25-1.79, P = 0.42), and trocar site infection (OR = 1.19, 95% CI, 0.34-4.20, P = 0.78).

Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences in the risk of major complications during the access manoeuvres between DTI and VN. A lower number of minor complications were observed in DTI compared with those in Veress access.

Keywords: Complications; Direct trocar insertion; Laparoscopy; Veress needle; Ways of entry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cuss A, Bhatt M, Abbott J (2015) Coming to terms with the fact that the evidence for laparoscopic entry is as good as it gets. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22(3):332–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2014.10.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R. (2006) Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD003677. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub3 . Update in:Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3):CD003677
    1. Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, de Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Trimbos JB (2004) Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed-versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:634–638 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mac Cordick C, Lécuru F, Rizk E, Robin F, Boucaya V, Taurelle R (1999) Morbidity in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: results of a prospective single-center study. Surg Endosc 13(1):57–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649900898 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Molloy D, Kaloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV (2002) Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42(3):246–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00246.x - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources