Textbook Outcomes in Liver Surgery: a Systematic Review
- PMID: 37069461
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05673-1
Textbook Outcomes in Liver Surgery: a Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Assessment of the quality of care among patients undergoing hepatectomy may be inadequate using traditional "siloed" postoperative surgical outcome metrics. In turn, the combination of several quality metrics into a single composite Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery (TOLS) may be more representative of "ideal" surgical care.
Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a search for primary articles on post-operative TOLS evaluation after hepatectomy was performed. Studies that did not present hepatectomy outcomes, pediatric or transplantation populations, duplicated series, and editorials were excluded. Studies were evaluated in aggregate for methodological variation, TOLS rates, factors associated with TOLS, hospital variation, and overall findings.
Results: Among 207 identified publications, 32 observational cohort studies were selected for inclusion in the review. There was a total of 90,077 hepatic resections performed from 1993 to 2020 in the analytic cohort. While TOLS definitions varied widely, all studies used an "all-or-none" composite structure combining a median of 5 (range: 4-7) discrete parameters. Observed TOLS rates varied in the different reported populations from 11.2 to 77.0%. TOLS was associated with patient, hospital, and operative factors.
Conclusions: This systematic review summarizes the contemporary international experience with TOLS to assess surgical performance following hepatobiliary surgery. TOLS is a single composite metric that may be more patient-centered, as well as better suited to quantify "optimal" care and compare performance among centers performing liver surgery.
Keywords: Hepatectomy; Liver surgery; Quality; Textbook outcome.
© 2023. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
References
-
- Bilimoria KY, Bentrem DJ, Lillemoe KD, Talamonti MS, Ko CY, Pancreatic Cancer Quality Indicator Development Expert Panel, American College of Surgeons. Assessment of pancreatic cancer care in the United States based on formally developed quality indicators. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(12):848-859. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djp107 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Dimick JB, Staiger DO, Hall BL, Ko CY, Birkmeyer JD. Composite measures for profiling hospitals on surgical morbidity. Ann Surg. 2013;257(1):67-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827b6be6 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ, Finks JF, et al. Composite measures for profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery performance. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(1):10-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4109 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Kolfschoten NE, Kievit J, Gooiker GA, et al. Focusing on desired outcomes of care after colon cancer resections; hospital variations in “textbook outcome.” Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013;39(2):156-163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.007 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Karthaus EG, Lijftogt N, Busweiler LAD, et al. Textbook Outcome: A Composite Measure for Quality of Elective Aneurysm Surgery. Annals of Surgery. 2017;266(5):898-904. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002388 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
