Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan 20;8(4):746-753.
doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.01.011. eCollection 2023 Apr.

Effects of Ertugliflozin on Kidney Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure at Baseline in the Evaluation of Ertugliflozin Efficacy and Safety Cardiovascular Outcomes (VERTIS CV) Trial

Affiliations

Effects of Ertugliflozin on Kidney Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure at Baseline in the Evaluation of Ertugliflozin Efficacy and Safety Cardiovascular Outcomes (VERTIS CV) Trial

David Z I Cherney et al. Kidney Int Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: In the eValuation of ERTugliflozin effIcacy and Safety CardioVascular outcomes (VERTIS CV) trial (NCT01986881), patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, ertugliflozin 5 mg or 15 mg (doses pooled for analyses as prospectively planned). In this post hoc analysis, the effects of ertugliflozin on kidney outcomes were assessed in analyses stratified by baseline heart failure (HF).

Methods: Baseline HF was defined as a history of HF or prerandomization left ventricular ejection fraction ≤45%. Outcomes included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) over time, total 5-year eGFR slopes and time to first event of a prespecified exploratory kidney composite outcome of sustained ≥40% decrease from baseline eGFR, chronic kidney replacement therapy, or kidney death. All analyses were stratified by baseline HF status.

Results: Compared with no-HF at baseline (n = 5807; 70.4%), patients with HF (n = 2439; 29.6%) had a notably faster rate of eGFR decline, which is unlikely to be explained by the slightly lower baseline eGFR in that group. Ertugliflozin treatment resulted in a slower rate of eGFR decline in both subgroups; total placebo-adjusted 5-year eGFR slopes (ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year [95% confidence intervals; CI]) were 0.96 (0.67-1.24) and 0.95 (0.76-1.14) for HF and no-HF subgroups, respectively. The placebo HF (vs. placebo no-HF) subgroup had a higher incidence of the composite kidney outcome (35/834 [4.20%] vs. 50/1913 [2.61%]). Hazard ratios (95% CI) for the effect of ertugliflozin on the composite kidney outcome did not differ significantly between HF and no-HF subgroups: 0.53 (0.33-0.84) and 0.76 (0.53-1.08), respectively (P interaction = 0.22).

Conclusion: Although patients with HF at baseline had a faster rate of eGFR decline in VERTIS CV, the beneficial effects of ertugliflozin on kidney outcomes did not differ when stratified by baseline HF.

Keywords: albuminuria; diabetic kidney disease; ertugliflozin; heart failure; sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Prespecified exploratory kidney composite outcome by baseline HF status. Analyses of the prespecified exploratory kidney composite outcome (sustained ≥40% decrease from baseline in eGFR, chronic kidney replacement therapy, or kidney death) were performed with data from all randomized patients (ITT population). CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HF, heart failure; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention-to-treat.
Figure 2
Figure 2
eGFR over time by baseline HF status. A RMANCOVA method was used for analysis of mean change from baseline in eGFR (calculated by the MDRD equation). BL, baseline; CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HF, heart failure; MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease; RMANCOVA, repeated measures analysis of covariance; W, week.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total 5-year eGFR slopes by baseline HF status. Yearly eGFR slope was assessed for the FAS population and analyzed by generalized random coefficient models. CI, confidence interval; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FAS, full analysis set; HF, heart failure; LSM, least-squares mean; W, week.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McGuire D.K., Shih W.J., Cosentino F., et al. Association of SGLT2 inhibitors with cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2021;6:148–158. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.4511. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fitchett D., Zinman B., Wanner C., et al. Heart failure outcomes with empagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk: results of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME(R) trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:1526–1534. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv728. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cosentino F., Cannon C.P., Cherney D.Z.I., et al. Efficacy of ertugliflozin on heart failure-related events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: results of the VERTIS CV trial. Circulation. 2020;142:2205–2215. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050255. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perkovic V., Jardine M.J., Neal B., et al. Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2295–2306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1811744. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Heerspink H.J.L., Stefansson B.V., Correa-Rotter R., et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1436–1446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816. - DOI - PubMed