Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;44(1):117-127.
doi: 10.1177/15394492231161283. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

Occupational Therapists in Patient Navigation: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Affiliations

Occupational Therapists in Patient Navigation: A Scoping Review of the Literature

Kristina M Kokorelias et al. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2024 Jan.

Abstract

This review seeks to understand the literature on patient navigator programs (PNPs) that employ occupational therapists (OTs), including the role (conceptualization), functions (operationalization) of OTs who work as patient navigators (PNs) and the settings and populations they serve. This review also mapped the role of PNs to the 2021 Competencies for Occupational Therapists in Canada. Scoping review methodology by Arksey and O'Malley (2005) was employed. Data were analyzed thematically and numerically to identify frequent patterns. Ten articles were included. Within PNPs, OTs worked in hospitals and communities, but their role was rarely well-defined. Five competency domains (i.e., communication and collaboration, culture, equity and justice, excellence in practice, professional responsibility, and engagement with the profession) were evident in existing PNPs that included OTs. This review supports the increasing interest in OTs as PNs by demonstrating the alignment between the OT competencies and roles and functions of OTs working within PNPs.

Keywords: chronic illness; continuity of care; coordination; occupational therapy; patient navigation; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram for New Systematic Reviews Which Included Searches of Databases Registers and Other Sources. Note. PRISMA = Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

References

    1. American Occupational Therapy Association. (2021). AOTA 2021 standards for continuing competence in occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 75(Suppl. 3), 7513410040. 10.5014/ajot.2021.75S3009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arksey H., O’Malley L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 - DOI
    1. Association of Canadian Occupational Therapy Regulatory Organizations. (2021). Essential competencies of practice for occupational therapists in Canada (3rd ed.). https://acotro-acore.org/sites/default/files/uploads/ACOTRO_EC_3rd_ed.pdf
    1. Braun V., Clarke V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26.
    1. Brown G. T., Rodger S., Brown A., Roever C. (2007). A profile of Canadian pediatric occupational therapy practice. Occupational Therapy in Health Care, 21(4), 39–69. 10.1300/J003v21n04_03 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources