Skin Cancer Screening: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
- PMID: 37071090
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.3262
Skin Cancer Screening: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force
Abstract
Importance: Skin cancer is the most common cancer type and is a major cause of morbidity.
Objective: To systematically review the benefits and harms of screening for skin cancer to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force.
Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from June 1, 2015, through January 7, 2022; surveillance through December 16, 2022.
Study selection: English-language studies conducted in asymptomatic populations 15 years or older.
Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently appraised the articles and extracted relevant data from fair- or good-quality studies; results were narratively summarized.
Main outcomes and measures: Morbidity; mortality; skin cancer stage, precursor lesions, or lesion thickness at detection; harms of screening.
Results: Twenty studies in 29 articles were included (N = 6 053 411). Direct evidence on screening effectiveness was from 3 nonrandomized analyses of 2 population-based skin cancer screening programs in Germany (n = 1 791 615) and suggested no melanoma mortality benefit at the population level over 4 to 10 years' follow-up. Six studies (n = 2 935 513) provided inconsistent evidence on the association between clinician skin examination and lesion thickness or stage at diagnosis. Compared with usual care, routine clinician skin examination was not associated with increased detection of skin cancer or precursor lesions (5 studies) or stage at melanoma detection (3 studies). Evidence on the association between clinician skin examination and lesion thickness at detection was inconsistent (3 studies). Nine studies (n = 1 326 051) found a consistent positive association between more advanced stage at melanoma detection and increasing risk of melanoma-associated and all-cause mortality. Two studies (n = 232) found little to no persistent cosmetic or psychosocial harms associated with screening.
Conclusions and relevance: A substantial nonrandomized evidence base suggests a clear association between earlier stage at skin cancer detection and decreased mortality risk. However, nonrandomized studies suggest little to no melanoma mortality benefit associated with skin cancer screening with visual skin examination in adolescents or adults and no association between routine clinician skin examination and earlier stage at melanoma detection. Evidence is inconsistent regarding whether clinician skin examination is associated with thinner melanoma lesions at detection.
Similar articles
-
Screening for Skin Cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2023 Apr. Report No.: 22-05297-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2023 Apr. Report No.: 22-05297-EF-1. PMID: 37184188 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for Skin Cancer in Adults: An Updated Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jul. Report No.: 14-05210-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jul. Report No.: 14-05210-EF-1. PMID: 27583318 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Screening for reducing morbidity and mortality in malignant melanoma.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jun 3;6(6):CD012352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012352.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31157404 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for Skin Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.JAMA. 2023 Apr 18;329(15):1290-1295. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.4342. JAMA. 2023. PMID: 37071089
-
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1978-1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4417. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 34003220
Cited by
-
Cancer in People with HIV.Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2024 Sep;38(3):531-557. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2024.06.007. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2024. PMID: 39111924 Review.
-
Positive Impact of UV Photography on Individual Sun Protection: A Swiss Feasibility Study.Int J Public Health. 2024 Sep 6;69:1607604. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2024.1607604. eCollection 2024. Int J Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39310720 Free PMC article.
-
Implementing systematic melanoma risk assessment and risk-tailored surveillance in a skin cancer focussed dermatology clinic: A qualitative study of feasibility and acceptability to patients and clinic staff.Cancer Med. 2024 Jan;13(2):e6976. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6976. Cancer Med. 2024. PMID: 38379327 Free PMC article.
-
The Level of Agreement between Self-Assessments and Examiner Assessments of Melanocytic Nevus Counts: Findings from an Evaluation of 4548 Double Assessments.Curr Oncol. 2024 Apr 13;31(4):2221-2232. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31040164. Curr Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38668067 Free PMC article.
-
The Prognostic Value of the 31-Gene Expression Profile Test in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Nov 4;16(21):3714. doi: 10.3390/cancers16213714. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39518150 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical