Cervical cancer in the pregnant population
- PMID: 37071123
- DOI: 10.1007/s00261-023-03836-x
Cervical cancer in the pregnant population
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the second most encountered cancer in pregnant patients. The 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for cervical cancer updated the staging of primary cervical carcinoma and disease process, with formal incorporation of imaging as a vital source of information in the management process to improve accuracy. Diagnosis and treatment of the pregnant population is a complex interplay of achieving adequate diagnostic information and optimal treatment while minimizing toxicity and risks to the mother and fetus. While novel imaging techniques and anticancer therapies are rapidly developed, much information on the safety and feasibility of different therapies is not yet available in the pregnant population. Therefore, managing pregnant patients with cervical cancer is complex and requires a multidisciplinary approach.
Keywords: Cervical cancer; Computed tomography; FIGO 2018; Magnetic resonance imaging; Pregnant; Ultrasound.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Imaging and Staging of Cervical Cancer.Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2019 Aug;40(4):280-286. doi: 10.1053/j.sult.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Mar 5. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2019. PMID: 31375168 Review.
-
MR Imaging in Cervical Cancer: Initial Staging and Treatment.Radiol Clin North Am. 2023 Jul;61(4):639-649. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Mar 28. Radiol Clin North Am. 2023. PMID: 37169429 Review.
-
Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 May;214(5):1182-1195. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21819. Epub 2020 Mar 17. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020. PMID: 32182097 Review.
-
Implications of the new FIGO staging and the role of imaging in cervical cancer.Br J Radiol. 2021 Sep 1;94(1125):20201342. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201342. Epub 2021 May 14. Br J Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33989030 Free PMC article. Review.
-
2018 FIGO Staging Classification for Cervical Cancer: Added Benefits of Imaging.Radiographics. 2020 Oct;40(6):1807-1822. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020200013. Epub 2020 Sep 18. Radiographics. 2020. PMID: 32946322 Review.
References
-
- de Haan J, Verheecke M, Van Calsteren K, et al. Oncological management and obstetric and neonatal outcomes for women diagnosed with cancer during pregnancy: a 20-year international cohort study of 1170 patients. Lancet Oncol 2018;19(3):337-346 (In eng). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30059-7 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Smith LH, Dalrymple JL, Leiserowitz GS, Danielsen B, Gilbert WM. Obstetrical deliveries associated with maternal malignancy in California, 1992 through 1997. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;184(7):1504–12; discussion 1512–3 (In eng). https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.114867 .
-
- Van Calsteren K, Vergote I, Amant F. Cervical neoplasia during pregnancy: diagnosis, management and prognosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005;19(4):611-30 (In eng). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2005.03.002 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Duggan B, Muderspach LI, Roman LD, Curtin JP, d'Ablaing G, 3rd, Morrow CP. Cervical cancer in pregnancy: reporting on planned delay in therapy. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82(4 Pt 1):598-602. (In eng). - PubMed
-
- Nguyen C, Montz FJ, Bristow RE. Management of stage I cervical cancer in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2000;55(10):633-43 (In eng). https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200010000-00022 . - DOI - PubMed