Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr;23(4):172-194.
doi: 10.1089/vbz.2022.0070.

Incidence of Lyme Borreliosis in Europe: A Systematic Review (2005-2020)

Affiliations

Incidence of Lyme Borreliosis in Europe: A Systematic Review (2005-2020)

Leah Burn et al. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2023 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Lyme borreliosis (LB) is the most common tick-borne disease in Europe, but the burden of disease is incompletely described. Methods: We conducted a systematic review across PubMed, EMBASE, and CABI Direct (Global Health) databases, from January 1, 2005, to November 20, 2020, of epidemiological studies reporting incidence of LB in Europe (PROSPERO, CRD42021236906). Results: The systematic review yielded 61 unique articles describing LB incidence (national or subnational) in 25 European countries. Substantial heterogeneity in study designs, populations sampled, and case definitions restricted data comparability. The European Union Concerted Action on Lyme Borreliosis (EUCALB)-published standardized LB case definitions were used by only 13 (21%) of the 61 articles. There were 33 studies that provided national-level LB incidence estimates for 20 countries. Subnational LB incidence was available from an additional four countries (Italy, Lithuania, Norway, and Spain). The highest LB incidences (>100 cases per 100,000 population per year [PPY]) were reported in Belgium, Finland, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. Incidences were 20-40/100,000 PPY in the Czech Republic, Germany, Poland, and Scotland and <20/100,000 PPY in Belarus, Croatia, Denmark, France, Ireland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, Sweden, and the United Kingdom (England, Northern Ireland, and Wales); markedly higher incidences were observed at the subnational level (up to 464/100,000 PPY in specific local areas). Conclusions: Although countries in Northern (Finland) and Western (Belgium, the Netherlands, and Switzerland) Europe reported the highest LB incidences, high incidences also were reported in some Eastern European countries. There was substantial subnational variation in incidence, including high incidences in some areas of countries with low overall incidence. This review, complemented by the incidence surveillance article, provides a comprehensive view into LB disease burden across Europe that may guide future preventive and therapeutic strategies-including new strategies on the horizon.

Keywords: Europe; Lyme Borreliosis; epidemiology; incidence; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

J.H.S., F.J.A., B.D.G., A.P., A.V., M.A.F., and J.C.M. are all employees of Pfizer and may hold stock/shares in Pfizer. L.B. and T.M.P.T. declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
PRISMA flow diagram. n, number of articles; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Forest plots of national-level annual incidence estimates in (A) Eastern Europe, (B) Northern Europe (Nordic region), (C) Northern Europe (The United Kingdom and Ireland), (D) Northern Europe (The United Kingdom and Ireland, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales), (E) Southern Europe, and (F) Western Europe. Stratified by clinical manifestations—as applicable (when reported in study). EM, erythema migrans; LB, Lyme borreliosis; LC, Lyme carditis; LNB, Lyme neuroborreliosis; NR, not reported; PPY, population per year.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Forest plots of national-level annual incidence estimates in (A) Eastern Europe, (B) Northern Europe (Nordic region), (C) Northern Europe (The United Kingdom and Ireland), (D) Northern Europe (The United Kingdom and Ireland, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales), (E) Southern Europe, and (F) Western Europe. Stratified by clinical manifestations—as applicable (when reported in study). EM, erythema migrans; LB, Lyme borreliosis; LC, Lyme carditis; LNB, Lyme neuroborreliosis; NR, not reported; PPY, population per year.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Forest plots of national-level annual incidence estimates in (A) Eastern Europe, (B) Northern Europe (Nordic region), (C) Northern Europe (The United Kingdom and Ireland), (D) Northern Europe (The United Kingdom and Ireland, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales), (E) Southern Europe, and (F) Western Europe. Stratified by clinical manifestations—as applicable (when reported in study). EM, erythema migrans; LB, Lyme borreliosis; LC, Lyme carditis; LNB, Lyme neuroborreliosis; NR, not reported; PPY, population per year.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Forest plots of national-level annual incidence estimates in (A) Eastern Europe, (B) Northern Europe (Nordic region), (C) Northern Europe (The United Kingdom and Ireland), (D) Northern Europe (The United Kingdom and Ireland, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales), (E) Southern Europe, and (F) Western Europe. Stratified by clinical manifestations—as applicable (when reported in study). EM, erythema migrans; LB, Lyme borreliosis; LC, Lyme carditis; LNB, Lyme neuroborreliosis; NR, not reported; PPY, population per year.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Forest plots of national-level annual incidence estimates in (A) Eastern Europe, (B) Northern Europe (Nordic region), (C) Northern Europe (The United Kingdom and Ireland), (D) Northern Europe (The United Kingdom and Ireland, England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales), (E) Southern Europe, and (F) Western Europe. Stratified by clinical manifestations—as applicable (when reported in study). EM, erythema migrans; LB, Lyme borreliosis; LC, Lyme carditis; LNB, Lyme neuroborreliosis; NR, not reported; PPY, population per year.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adlhoch C, Poggensee G. Lyme-borreliose: ein situationsbericht aus den sechs östlichen Bundesländern 2007–2009. Robert Koch Institut, 2010; pp. 5–8; doi: 10.25646/654 Available from: https://edoc.rki.de/handle/176904/729 [Last accessed: January 14, 2023]. - DOI
    1. Altpeter E, Zimmermann H, Oberreich J, et al. . Tick related diseases in Switzerland, 2008 to 2011. Swiss Med Wkly 2013;143:w13725; doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13725 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aucott J, Morrison C, Munoz B, et al. . Diagnostic challenges of early Lyme disease: Lessons from a community case series. BMC Infect Dis 2009;9:79; doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-9-79 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernard Q, Thakur M, Smith AA, et al. . Borrelia burgdorferi protein interactions critical for microbial persistence in mammals. Cell Microbiol 2019;21:e12885; doi: 10.1111/cmi.12885 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bochničková M, Szilágyiová M, Gardlík R. Lyme borreliosis—Epidemiological analysis of incidence in the northern region of Slovakia. Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol 2012;61:3–8. - PubMed

Publication types