Factors Associated With Knowledge and Experience of Self-managed Abortion Among Patients Seeking Care at 49 US Abortion Clinics
- PMID: 37071424
- PMCID: PMC10114063
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.8701
Factors Associated With Knowledge and Experience of Self-managed Abortion Among Patients Seeking Care at 49 US Abortion Clinics
Abstract
Importance: Patients attending US abortion clinics may consider or try self-managing their abortion before coming to the clinic, yet little is known about the factors associated with self-management behavior.
Objective: To examine the prevalence and factors associated with considering or attempting a self-managed abortion before attending a clinic.
Design, setting, and participants: This survey study included patients obtaining an abortion at 49 independent, Planned Parenthood, and academic-affiliated clinics chosen to maximize diversity in geographic, state policy, and demographic context in 29 states between December 2018 and May 2020. Data were analyzed from December 2020 to July 2021.
Exposures: Obtaining an abortion at a clinic.
Main outcomes and measures: Knowledge of medications used to self-manage an abortion, having considered medication self-management before attending the clinic, having considered any method of self-management before attending the clinic, and having tried any method of self-management before attending the clinic.
Results: The study included 19 830 patients, of which 99.6.% (17 823 patients) identified as female; 60.9% (11 834 patients) were aged 20 to 29 years; 29.6% (5824 patients) identified as Black, 19.3% (3799 patients) as Hispanic, and 36.0% (7095 patients) as non-Hispanic White; 44.1% (8252 patients) received social services; and 78.3% (15 197 patients) were 10 weeks pregnant or less. Approximately 1 in 3 (34%) knew about self-managed medication abortion, and among this subsample of 6750 patients, 1 in 6 (1079 patients [16.1%]) had considered using medications to self-manage before attending the clinic. Among the full sample, 1 in 8 (11.7%) considered self-managing using any method before clinic attendance, and among this subsample of 2328 patients, almost 1 in 3 (670 patients [28.8%]) attempted to do so. Preference for at-home abortion care was associated with considering medication self-management (odds ratio [OR], 3.52; 95% CI, 2.94-4.21), considering any method of self-management (OR, 2.80; 95% CI, 2.50-3.13), and attempting any method of self-management (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.10-1.69). Experiencing clinic access barriers was also associated with considering medication self-management (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.69-2.32) and considering any method of self-management (OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.89-2.32).
Conclusions and relevance: In this survey study, considering self-managed abortion was common before accessing in-clinic care, particularly among those on the margins of access or with a preference for at-home care. These findings suggest a need for expanded access to telemedicine and other decentralized abortion care models.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Knowledge, interest, and motivations surrounding self-managed medication abortion among patients at three Texas clinics.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):238.e1-238.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.026. Epub 2020 Mar 3. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32142830 Free PMC article.
-
Factors Associated With Use of an Online Telemedicine Service to Access Self-managed Medical Abortion in the US.JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111852. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11852. JAMA Netw Open. 2021. PMID: 34019085 Free PMC article.
-
"I'll just deal with this on my own": a qualitative exploration of experiences with self-managed abortion in the United States.Reprod Health. 2021 May 4;18(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01142-7. Reprod Health. 2021. PMID: 33947413 Free PMC article.
-
Self-managed abortion.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;31(6):435-440. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000585. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31693568 Review.
-
Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review.BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 16;12(11):e066650. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066650. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 36385017 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Using Natural Language Processing to Describe the Use of an Online Community for Abortion During 2022: Dynamic Topic Modeling Analysis of Reddit Posts.JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jul 9;5:e72771. doi: 10.2196/72771. JMIR Infodemiology. 2025. PMID: 40633918 Free PMC article.
-
Behavioral Innovations to Access Abortion Post-Dobbs: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Reddit's r/abortion Community in 2022.Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251351192. doi: 10.1177/00469580251351192. Epub 2025 Jun 27. Inquiry. 2025. PMID: 40577373 Free PMC article.
-
Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024 Sep;56(3):199-210. doi: 10.1111/psrh.12288. Epub 2024 Nov 13. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 39537337 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Managed Abortion Attempts Before vs After Changes in Federal Abortion Protections in the US.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424310. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24310. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 39078630 Free PMC article.
-
Abortion access barriers shared in "r/abortion" after Roe: a qualitative analysis of a Reddit community post-Dobbs decision leak in 2022.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024 Dec;32(1):2426921. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2426921. Epub 2024 Dec 6. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024. PMID: 39513330 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Guttmacher Institute . Abortion policy in the absence of Roe. February 1, 2023. Accessed February 3, 2023. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/abortion-policy-absence-roe
-
- Center for Reproductive Rights . After Roe fell: abortion laws by state. Accessed February 3, 2023. https://reproductiverights.org/maps/abortion-laws-by-state/
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical