Late Response to Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
- PMID: 37072224
- PMCID: PMC10513886
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207292
Late Response to Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the frequency and characteristics of late responders (>12 weeks) to monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP).
Methods: This is a multicenter (n = 16) prospective real-life study considering all consecutive adults with high-frequency or chronic migraine treated with anti-CGRP mAbs for ≥24 weeks. We defined responder patients with a ≥50% reduction from baseline in monthly migraine/headache days at weeks 9-12 and late responders as those achieving a ≥50% reduction only afterward.
Results: A total of 771 people with migraine completed ≥24 weeks of anti-CGRP mAb treatment. Responders at 12 weeks were 65.6% (506/771) of the patients, while nonresponders were 34.4% (265/771). A total of 146 of the 265 nonresponders (55.1%) at 12 weeks responded afterward (late responders): they differed from responders for a higher BMI (+0.78, 95% CI [0.10; 1.45]; p = 0.024), more frequent treatment failures (+0.52, 95% CI [0.09; 0.95]; p = 0.017) and psychiatric comorbidities (+10.1%, 95% CI [0.1; 0.20]; p = 0.041), and less common unilateral pain, alone (-10,9%, 95% CI [-20.5; -1.2]; p = 0.025) or in combination with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms (-12.3%, 95% CI [-20.2;-3.9]; p = 0.006) or allodynia (-10.7, 95% CI [-18.2; -3.2]; p = 0.01).
Discussion: Half of nonresponders to anti-CGRP mAbs at 12 weeks are indeed late responders. Efficacy of anti-CGRP mAbs should be assessed at 24 weeks while treatment duration should be extended beyond 12 months.
© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.
Conflict of interest statement
Piero Barbanti received travel grants and honoraria for participating in advisory boards, speaker panels, or clinical investigation studies from Alder, Allergan, Angelini, Assosalute, Bayer, ElectroCore, Eli-Lilly, GSK, Lundbeck, Lusofarmaco, 1MED, MSD, New Penta, Noema Pharma, Novartis, Stx-Med, Teva, Visufarma, and Zambon. Cinzia Aurilia received travel grants from FB-Health, Lusofarmaco, Almirall, Eli-Lilly Novartis and Teva; Gabriella Egeo received travel grants and honoraria from Eli-Lilly, Novartis, New Penta, and Ecupharma; Paola Torelli received travel grants and honoraria as a speaker or for participating in advisory boards from Novartis, Teva, Eli Lilly, and Allergan; Stefania Proietti has no disclosures to declare; Sabina Cevoli received honoraria for participating in speaker panels from Teva and Novartis. Stefano Bonassi has no disclosures to declare. Go to
Figures

References
-
- Silberstein SD, Ortega M, Elms S, et al. . Long-term Efficacy of Fremanezumab in patients with chronic or episodic migraine who were inadequate responders to initial fremanezumab treatment. Neurology. 2021;96(suppl 15):2406.
-
- Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubbl ica Italiana. Serie Generale n; 2020. Accessed January 17, 2023. gazzettaufficiale.it/gazzetta/serie_generale/caricaDettaglio?dataPubblic....
-
- Erenumab for preventing migraine. Technology appraisal guidance [TA682] Published March 10, 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/TA682/chapter/1-Recommendations.
-
- Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(1):1-211. - PubMed