Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;15(5):1281-1288.
doi: 10.1111/os.13704. Epub 2023 Apr 18.

The Fusion Rate of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation and Pedicle Screw Fixations in L4-5 Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

The Fusion Rate of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation and Pedicle Screw Fixations in L4-5 Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Yuhe Lin et al. Orthop Surg. 2023 May.

Abstract

Objective: Although cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation has been used for several years, the number of studies on its fusion effects is limited. Furthermore, several studies report conflicting outcomes. We aimed to compare the fusion rates and clinical efficacy of CBT screw fixation and pedicle screw (PS) fixation for L4-L5 interbody fusion.

Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort control study. Patients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent L4-L5 oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) or posterior decompression using CBT screws between February 2016 and February 2019 were included. Patients in whom PS was used were matched for age, sex, height, weight, and BMI. Record the operation time, blood loss. All enrolled patients underwent lumbar CT imaging at one-year follow-up to evaluate the fusion rate. At the two-year follow-up the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (JOA) were used to identify symptom improvement. Independent t-test was used for the comparison, and score data were analyzed using the χ2 and exact probability tests.

Results: A total of 144 patients with were included. All patients were followed-up postoperatively for 25-36 months (average 32.42 ± 10.55 months). Twenty-eight patients underwent OLIF and CBT screw fixation, 36 underwent OLIF and PS fixation, 32 underwent posterior decompression and CBT screw fixation, and 48 underwent posterior decompression and PS fixation. The fusion rates following CBT screw and PS fixations in OLIF were 92.86% (26/28) and 91.67% (33/36), respectively (P = 1). The fusion rates following CBT screw and PS fixations in posterior decompression were 93.75% (30/32) and 93.75% (45/48), respectively (P > 0.05). Regardless of OLIF or posterior decompression, there were no significant differences in the VAS, ODI, and JOA scores between patients treated with CBT and PS (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: CBT screw fixation can achieve a satisfactory interbody fusion rate with a clinical efficacy similar to that of PS in patients with lumbar degenerative disease, regardless of whether OLIF or posterior decompression was performed.

Keywords: Comparative study; Cortical bone trajectory screw; Interbody fusion; Lumbar degenerative disease; Pedicle screw.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Follow the flow chart of the above criteria.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A, B): Patient's preoperative MRI scan images showing stenosis of the canal at the L4‐L5 level. (C, D): Radiographs obtained at 6 months follow‐up indicating satisfactory internal fixation. (E): CT images obtained at one‐year follow‐up showing satisfactory interbody fusion at L4‐L5. (F): Healed incision of approximately 2 cm length at one‐year follow‐up.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zhang Y, Lu D, Ji W, He F, Chen AC, Yang H, et al. Which is the most effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis: decompression, fusion, or interspinous process device? A Bayesian network meta‐analysis. J Orthop Translat. 2020;26:45–53. 10.1016/j.jot.2020.07.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dan L, Xiaopeng D, Jiacai Q, Han F, Zhou K. Comparison of different pedicle screw fixation schemes in the treatment of neurosurgical spinal fractures: systematic review and meta‐analysis. J. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:12678–89. - PubMed
    1. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. J Spine. 2004;29(17):1938–44. - PubMed
    1. Babu R, Park JG, Mehta AI, et al. Comparison of superior‐level facet joint violations during open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement. J Neurosurgery. 2012;71(5):962–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Viezens L, Sellenschloh K, Püschel K, Morlock MM, Lehmann W, Huber G, et al. Impact of screw diameter on pedicle screw fatigue strength‐a biomechanical evaluation. J World Neurosurg. 2021;152:e369–76. 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.108 - DOI - PubMed