The Fusion Rate of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation and Pedicle Screw Fixations in L4-5 Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 37073082
- PMCID: PMC10157714
- DOI: 10.1111/os.13704
The Fusion Rate of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation and Pedicle Screw Fixations in L4-5 Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Objective: Although cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw fixation has been used for several years, the number of studies on its fusion effects is limited. Furthermore, several studies report conflicting outcomes. We aimed to compare the fusion rates and clinical efficacy of CBT screw fixation and pedicle screw (PS) fixation for L4-L5 interbody fusion.
Methods: This study was a retrospective cohort control study. Patients with lumbar degenerative disease who underwent L4-L5 oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) or posterior decompression using CBT screws between February 2016 and February 2019 were included. Patients in whom PS was used were matched for age, sex, height, weight, and BMI. Record the operation time, blood loss. All enrolled patients underwent lumbar CT imaging at one-year follow-up to evaluate the fusion rate. At the two-year follow-up the visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (JOA) were used to identify symptom improvement. Independent t-test was used for the comparison, and score data were analyzed using the χ2 and exact probability tests.
Results: A total of 144 patients with were included. All patients were followed-up postoperatively for 25-36 months (average 32.42 ± 10.55 months). Twenty-eight patients underwent OLIF and CBT screw fixation, 36 underwent OLIF and PS fixation, 32 underwent posterior decompression and CBT screw fixation, and 48 underwent posterior decompression and PS fixation. The fusion rates following CBT screw and PS fixations in OLIF were 92.86% (26/28) and 91.67% (33/36), respectively (P = 1). The fusion rates following CBT screw and PS fixations in posterior decompression were 93.75% (30/32) and 93.75% (45/48), respectively (P > 0.05). Regardless of OLIF or posterior decompression, there were no significant differences in the VAS, ODI, and JOA scores between patients treated with CBT and PS (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: CBT screw fixation can achieve a satisfactory interbody fusion rate with a clinical efficacy similar to that of PS in patients with lumbar degenerative disease, regardless of whether OLIF or posterior decompression was performed.
Keywords: Comparative study; Cortical bone trajectory screw; Interbody fusion; Lumbar degenerative disease; Pedicle screw.
© 2023 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study.J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Nov;25(5):591-595. doi: 10.3171/2016.3.SPINE151525. Epub 2016 May 27. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016. PMID: 27231813
-
Cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional pedicle screw fixation for 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of surgical outcomes for 2-level degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jan;28(1):57-62. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161154. Epub 2017 Nov 10. J Neurosurg Spine. 2018. PMID: 29125430
-
Safety and Efficacy of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Fixation Combined with Facet Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Disease.Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(6):1617-1626. doi: 10.1111/os.13752. Epub 2023 May 18. Orthop Surg. 2023. PMID: 37199023 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative clinical efficacy and safety of cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Spine J. 2019 Jul;28(7):1678-1689. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-05999-y. Epub 2019 May 13. Eur Spine J. 2019. PMID: 31087165
-
Comparison of outcomes between cortical screws and traditional pedicle screws for lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Aug 23;14(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1311-x. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31443671 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparative Analysis Between Cortical Bone Trajectory (CBT) Screw Fixation and Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus. 2025 Jul 14;17(7):e87944. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87944. eCollection 2025 Jul. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40821299 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Dan L, Xiaopeng D, Jiacai Q, Han F, Zhou K. Comparison of different pedicle screw fixation schemes in the treatment of neurosurgical spinal fractures: systematic review and meta‐analysis. J. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10:12678–89. - PubMed
-
- Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. J Spine. 2004;29(17):1938–44. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources