Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan-Dec;15(1):2195517.
doi: 10.1080/19420862.2023.2195517.

"Stapling" scFv for multispecific biotherapeutics of superior properties

Affiliations

"Stapling" scFv for multispecific biotherapeutics of superior properties

Lauren E Boucher et al. MAbs. 2023 Jan-Dec.

Abstract

Single-chain fragment variable (scFv) domains play an important role in antibody-based therapeutic modalities, such as bispecifics, multispecifics and chimeric antigen receptor T cells or natural killer cells. However, scFv domains exhibit lower stability and increased risk of aggregation due to transient dissociation ("breathing") and inter-molecular reassociation of the two domains (VL and VH). We designed a novel strategy, referred to as stapling, that introduces two disulfide bonds between the scFv linker and the two variable domains to minimize scFv breathing. We named the resulting molecules stapled scFv (spFv). Stapling increased thermal stability (Tm) by an average of 10°C. In multiple scFv/spFv multispecifics, the spFv molecules display significantly improved stability, minimal aggregation and superior product quality. These spFv multispecifics retain binding affinity and functionality. Our stapling design was compatible with all antibody variable regions we evaluated and may be widely applicable to stabilize scFv molecules for designing biotherapeutics with superior biophysical properties.

Keywords: Multi-specific antibody; Scfv; Scfv stabilization; Single chain fv; Spfv; Stapled scfv.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

JL, LEB, MF, MD, AAA, AT & CH are co-inventors in a provisional patent application (US20210047435A1). This application covers the scFv stapling technology and its potential applications in multispecific antibodies and other therapeutic or diagnostic protein modalities and detection reagents wherever scFv can normally be used.

Figures

A single-chain Fv (scFv) undergoes transient dissociation and reassociation with neighboring molecules, leading to oligomers and aggregates. An scFv can also unfold due to low thermal stability and result in aggregation. Stapling, i.e., forming two specific disulfide bonds between the linker and the V domains (one each) can prevent aggregation due to both mechanisms. Stapling is achieved by having a CPPC motif in the flexible linker and the anchor positions chosen to be structurally compatible for the specific disulfide bond formation.
Figure 1.
Stapling of scFv. (a) scFv stapling to improve low stability and minimize breathing-mediated aggregation. (b) Cartoon schematic of the stapling scheme using HL configuration as example. A similar scheme is valid for the LH construct. Pink dashed lines indicate flexible linkers connecting the C-terminus of leading variable region and the N-terminus of the trailing variable region to the stapling ‘CPPC’ motif. The segment labeled CPPC in the middle of the linker indicates one possible design of a staple which occurs naturally in the IgG1 hinge. Anchor points (labeled C(APL) and C(APH)) that are mutated to Cys residues in VH and VL are shown in stick. Short lines (yellow) between the staple and anchor point Cys residues indicate disulfide bond formation. Distances dstaple and dAP (yellow, dashed line) are labeled (c) Graphical illustration of anchor point selection geometry consideration (HL configuration) mapped onto the structure of an Fv from a human germline antibody (PDB ID 5I19, GLk1). Cter: C terminus of leading domain; Nter: N terminus of trailing domain; APH: anchor position on leading domain; APL: anchor position on trailing domain; dAP: distance between APH and APH; d1-d4: various distances as defined in the figure. Similar illustrations can be drawn for the LH orientation (not shown). Anchor points for HL orientation are Chothia position 43 for VH (H43C) and position 100 for VL (L100C); for LH: Chothia position 42 in VL (L42C) and 105 in VH (H105C). (d, e) Cβ(Cys1)-Cβ(Cys2) distance between Cys residues in hinge CPPC motifs in structures of human IgG4 (PDB 5DK3; (d) and mouse IgG2a (PDB 1IGT; (e). These distances range from about 7 Å to 9 Å.
An SDS-PAGE image showing that stapled scFv (or spFv) runs faster than the unstapled scFv. DSC data indicate an approximately 12 °C increase in thermal stability (Tm) for these spFv molecules compared with the unstapled versions.
Figure 2.
Stapling design improves the thermal stability of Cris7a/b domains. (a) SDS-PAGE of scFv and spFv proteins of Cris7a/Cris7b in LH orientation. (b) Thermal stability of Cris7a scFv/spFv and Cris7b scFv/spFv domains by DSC. Parameters related to protein design and enthalpy features from analysis are listed in Table S1.
Crystal structures of several spFv molecules alone and some in complex with target proteins show stapling disulfide bonds form as designed. These images also show that orientation (LH or HL) or antigen binding does not impact the Fv structures.
Figure 3.
Structures and comparison of various scFv/spFv domains. In all structures, VL is colored blue and VH is colored green. The linker segments are colored pink. (a) GLk1 spFv LH. (b) GLk1 spFv HL. (c) GLk2 spFv HL. (d) 2mfo-dFc electron density contoured at 1.5 σ about the CPPC staple motif and anchor points for Glk2 spFv HL. Circles in orange indicate the stapling disulfide density. (e) CAT2200b spFv HL. (f) unbound CAT2200b spFv HL compared with CAT2200a scFv LH bound to IL-17 (silver). (g) front and back views of unbound CAT2200b spFv HL compared with CAT2200a spFv LH bound to IL-17 (silver).
The stapling linker structures are superimposed on the CPPC motif and this image shows that they are very similar with a small distance range between the two Cys residues in the stapling linker.
Figure 4.
The staple and linker conformations in 5 spFv structures (bright green, GLk1 spFv LH; light pink, GLk1 spFv HL; purple, GLk2 spFv HL; light green, CAT2200 spFv LH bound to IL-17; orange, CAT2200 spFv HL unbound). The CPPC motif has been re-labeled as Cys1, Pro1, Pro2, Cys2 for clarity. The structures are superimposed on the mainchain of the CPPC motif. The dashed lines indicate Cα-Cα and Cβ-Cβ distances between the Cys1 and Cys2 residues. The range of Cβ-Cβ distances observed in all copies of the linker staple Cys residues are indicated. N-termini are indicated with ‘Nter’, C-termini are indicated with ‘Cter’.
An image of a bispecific antibody with one chain as Fab and the other as an scFv or spFv. On SEC, the spFv bispecific antibody is mostly monomer, whereas the scFv bispecific contains mainly an oligomer species. Mass spectrometry data indicate that the stapling disulfide bonds are formed as designed.
Figure 5.
Bispecifics with spFv show improved yields, product quality and expected disulfide formation in the stapled linker. (a) Schematic of BCMA (Fab) x CD3 (scFv/spFv) bispecific molecular architecture. HK in Fc regions indicate the knob-in-hole (K, knob; H, hole) mutations for Fc heterodimerization. RF (H435R and Y436F) mutations in the Fab containing heavy chain are introduced for purification to prevent binding to Protein A of RF containing chain monomers or homodimers. (b) SEC profiles post-CH1 of scFv/spFv Cris7b containing molecules with mAb1 indicate presence of oligomer species (labeled O) in scFv proteins that is absent in spFv proteins (monomer, M). (c) MS2-HCD spectrum of the peptide derived from non-reduced proalanase digestion representing the expected stapled disulfide linkage between Cys119-Cys237. The b- and – y type backbone fragments from each peptide half are annotated in the sequence map that is composed of Pep1 and Pep2 connected via the disulfide bridge.
The spFv bispecific is thermally more stable than the scFv bispecific with a Tm change of about 10 °C. Upon incubation at 40 °C at >50 mg/ml concentrations for an extended period, the spFv bispecific remained largely monomeric, but the scFv bispecific shows 30% aggregates by SEC. Octet data indicate that the corresponding spFv and scFv bind the target with similar association and dissociation profiles.
Figure 6.
Cris7b spFv bispecific proteins with mAb1 are stable and retain binding affinity to CD3. (a) NanoDSF traces of Cris7b scFv/spFv bispecifics with mAb1 (TD01B49, TD01B46) show~10°C transition to higher Tm on incorporation of stapling mutations. (b, c) Cris7b spFv bispecific proteins are resistant to heat-induced aggregation. SEC traces (b) and quantification of aggregate levels (c) show that Cris7b spFv bispecifics have a dramatic reduction in heat-induced aggregation over 6 week time frame at either 4°C or 40°C. (d) BLI binding traces show comparable binding features (association and dissociation) for binding to recombinant CD3. Green: Cris7b spFv, TD01B46; blue: Cris7b scFv Bird, TD01B49; Orange dashed lines: Cris7b G4S, TD01B48.
The corresponding stapled and unstapled bispecifics show similar killing activity of cancer cells through CD3 redirection. Both the scFv- and spFv-bispecific activate CD4+ and CD8+ T cells similarly.
Figure 7.
spFv bispecific molecules function similarly to their non-stapled counterparts. (a) spFv bispecific (TD01B46) has potent killing activity of BCMA+ cancer cells. (b, c) scFv (TD01B49)/spFv bispecifics (TD01B46) activate CD4+/CD25+ (b) and CD8+/CD25+ (c) T cells with similar potency. The negative control has no killing or T cell activating activity.

References

    1. Lu RM, Hwang YC, Liu IJ, Lee CC, Tsai HZ, Li HJ, Wu HC.. Development of therapeutic antibodies for the treatment of diseases. J Biomed Sci. 2020;27:1. doi:10.1186/s12929-019-0592-z. PMID: 31894001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Senior M. Fresh from the biotech pipeline: fewer approvals, but biologics gain share. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41:174–15. doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01630-6. PMID: 36624153. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kaplon H, Crescioli S, Chenoweth A, Visweswaraiah J, Reichert JM. Antibodies to watch in 2023. mAbs. 2023;15:2153410. doi:10.1080/19420862.2022.2153410. PMID: 36472472. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carter PJ, Rajpal A. Designing antibodies as therapeutics. Cell. 2022;185:2789–805. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.05.029. PMID: 35868279. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brinkmann U, Kontermann RE. The making of bispecific antibodies. mAbs. 2017;9:182–212. doi:10.1080/19420862.2016.1268307. PMID: 28071970. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources