Proximal tibia osteotomy with absorbable spacer combined with fibular osteotomy versus high tibial osteotomy for medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis
- PMID: 37074375
- DOI: 10.1007/s00264-023-05808-8
Proximal tibia osteotomy with absorbable spacer combined with fibular osteotomy versus high tibial osteotomy for medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis
Abstract
Purpose: The study aimed to compare the perioperative complications, short-term clinical outcomes, patient-reported outcomes, and radiographic parameters of tibiofibular proximal osteotomy combined with absorbable spacer insertion (TPOASI) and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) in a two year postoperative time period.
Methods: A total of 160 patients with Kellgren-Lawrence classification grade 3 medial compartmental knee OA were randomized to receive either TPOASI (n = 82) or OWHTO (n = 78). The primary and secondary outcomes were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at each follow-up examination. The primary outcomes were the between-group change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Global score (WOMAC). Secondary measures included visual analog scale (VAS), radiographic parameters, American Knee Society Score (KSS), operation time, blood loss, length of incision, hospital stay, and relevant complications. Postoperative radiographic parameters, including the femorotibial angle (FTA), varus angle (VA), and joint line convergence angle (JLCA), were measured to evaluate the correction of varus deformity.
Results: No significant differences were found in the baseline data between the two groups. Both methods improved functional status and pain postoperatively. For primary outcomes of both groups, statistical difference was observed in WOMAC scores at the 6-month follow-up (P < 0.001). For secondary outcomes, no statistical difference was observed between the groups during the 2-year follow-up (P > 0.05). For TPOASI vs. OWHTO, the mean hospital stay (6.6 ± 1.3 days vs. 7.8 ± 2.1 days) was shorter (P < 0.001), and both blood loss (70.56 ± 35.58 vs. 174.00 ± 66.33 mL) and complication rate (3.7% vs. 12.8%) were significantly lower (P < 0.005 for both).
Conclusions: Both approaches showed satisfactory functional outcomes and alleviated pain. However, TPOASI is a simple, feasible method with few complications, and it could be widely used.
Keywords: Absorbable spacer insertion; Knee osteoarthritis; Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy.
© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.
Similar articles
-
Spacer-type tibial osteotomy versus open wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4 medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in patients younger than 65 years.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 27;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05533-5. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 39865261 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Preoperative Tibial Varus Deformity With Joint Line Orientation and Clinical Outcome After Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Medial Compartment Osteoarthritis: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2021 Nov;49(13):3551-3560. doi: 10.1177/03635465211044146. Epub 2021 Oct 8. Am J Sports Med. 2021. PMID: 34623942
-
Proximal tibial osteotomy with absorbable spacer combined with fibular osteotomy has similar clinical outcomes to high tibial osteotomy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis.Int Orthop. 2023 Nov;47(11):2699-2708. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05894-8. Epub 2023 Jul 25. Int Orthop. 2023. PMID: 37490078
-
Proximal fibular osteotomy versus high tibial osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Oct 28;17(1):470. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03299-8. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022. PMID: 36307827 Free PMC article.
-
[Clinical application and research status of open wedge high tibial osteotomy].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 May 15;33(5):640-643. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201901014. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019. PMID: 31090361 Free PMC article. Review. Chinese.
Cited by
-
Spacer-type tibial osteotomy versus open wedge high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3-4 medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis in patients younger than 65 years.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jan 27;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05533-5. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 39865261 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Lyu SR, Lee CC, Hsu CC (2015) Medial abrasion syndrome: a neglected cause of knee pain in middle and old age. Medicine 94(16):e736. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000000736 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Guccione AA, Felson DT, Anderson JJ, Anthony JM, Zhang Y, Wilson PW, Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kreger BE, Kannel WB (1994) The effects of specific medical conditions on the functional limitations of elders in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 84(3):351–358. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.84.3.351 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Amin S, Luepongsak N, McGibbon CA, LaValley MP, Krebs DE, Felson DT (2004) Knee adduction moment and development of chronic knee pain in elders. Arthritis Rheum 15 51(3):371–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.20396 - DOI
-
- Miyazaki T, Wada M, Kawahara H, Sato M, Baba H, Shimada S (2002) Dynamic load at baseline can predict radiographic disease progression in medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 61(7):617–622. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.61.7.617 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Outeren MV, Waarsing JH, Brouwer RW, Reijman M, Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA (2018) Response to the Letter to the Editor: ‘Is a high tibial osteotomy superior to non-surgical treatment in patients with varus malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis?’ Osteoarthr Cartil 26(6):e3–e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2018.03.012 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources