Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;32(8):2627-2636.
doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07699-0. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

Economic comparisons of endoscopic spine surgery: a systematic review

Affiliations

Economic comparisons of endoscopic spine surgery: a systematic review

Jeff D Golan et al. Eur Spine J. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: Full-endoscopic techniques are minimally invasive surgery alternatives to traditional spinal surgery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the costs of these techniques compared to traditional approaches.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed for economic evaluations that compare endoscopic decompressions of the lumbar spine for stenosis or disc herniation to open or microsurgical decompressions. The search was performed in the following databases: Medline, Embase Classic, Embase, and Central Cochrane library, from January 1, 2005, to October 22, 2022. The included studies were each evaluated according to a formal assessment checklist to evaluate the quality of economic evaluations based on 35 criteria.

Result: A total of 1153 studies were identified, with 9 articles included in the final analysis. In evaluating the quality of economic evaluations, the study with the fewest met criteria scored 9/35 and the study with the most met criteria scored 28/35. Only 3 studies completed cost-effectiveness analyses. Surgical procedure duration varied between studies, but hospital length of stays were consistently shorter with endoscopy. While endoscopy was more frequently associated with higher operating costs, studies that measured healthcare and societal costs found endoscopy to be advantageous.

Conclusion: Endoscopic spine surgery was found to be cost-effective in treating patients with lumbar stenosis and disc herniation when compared to standard microscopic approaches from a societal perspective. More well-designed economic evaluations investigating the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic spine procedures are needed to further support these findings.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Endoscopic; MIS; Spine surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Blamoutier A (2013) Surgical discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: surgical techniques. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 99:S187–S196 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lurie J, Tomkins-Lane C (2016) Management of lumbar spinal stenosis. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h6234 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. McAfee PC, Phillips FM, Andersson G, Buvenenadran A, Kim CW, Lauryssen C et al (2010) Minimally invasive spine surgery. Spine 35:S271–S273 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Choi G, Pophale CS, Patel B, Uniyal P (2017) Endoscopic spine surgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 60:485–497 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Vaishnav AS, Othman YA, Virk SS, Gang CH, Qureshi SA (2019) Current state of minimally invasive spine surgery. J Spine Surg 5:S2-10 - DOI - PubMed - PMC

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources