Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;45(4):864-874.
doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01578-w. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

Formal and informal venous thromboembolism risk assessment and impact on prescribing of thromboprophylaxis: a retrospective cohort study

Megan Kemp  1   2 , Amy Hai Yan Chan  1 , Jeff Harrison  1 , Hannah Rogers  2 , Adele Zhao  1 , Harleen Kaur  1 , Genevieve Tang  1 , Esther Yang  1 , Kebede Beyene  3   4
Affiliations

Formal and informal venous thromboembolism risk assessment and impact on prescribing of thromboprophylaxis: a retrospective cohort study

Megan Kemp et al. Int J Clin Pharm. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Hospital-acquired thrombosis (HAT) is a leading cause of preventable death and disability worldwide. HAT includes any venous thromboembolic (VTE) event occurring in-hospital or within 90-days of hospitalisation. Despite availability of evidence-based guidelines for HAT risk assessment and prophylaxis, guidelines are still underutilised.

Aim: To determine the proportion of patients who developed HAT that could have been potentially prevented with appropriate VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis at a large public hospital in New Zealand. Additionally, the predictors of VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis were examined.

Method: VTE patients admitted under general medicine, reablement, general surgery, or orthopaedic surgery service were identified using ICD-10-AM codes. Data were collected on patient characteristics, VTE risk factors, and the thromboprophylaxis regimen prescribed. The hospital VTE guidelines were used to determine rates of VTE risk assessment and the appropriateness of thromboprophylaxis.

Results: Of 1302 VTE patients, 213 HATs were identified. Of these, 116 (54%) received VTE risk assessment, and 98 (46%) received thromboprophylaxis. Patients who received VTE risk assessment were 15 times more likely to receive thromboprophylaxis (odds ratio [OR] = 15.4; 95% CI 7.65-30.98) and 2.8 times more likely to receive appropriate thromboprophylaxis (OR = 2.79; 95% CI 1.59-4.89).

Conclusion: A large proportion of high-risk patients who were admitted to medical, general surgery and reablement services and who developed HAT did not receive VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis during their index admission, demonstrating a significant gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice. Implementing mandatory VTE risk assessment and adherence to guidelines to improve thromboprophylaxis prescription in hospitalised patients may help reduce the burden of HAT.

Keywords: Thromboembolic prophylaxis; VTE risk assessment; Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; Venous thrombosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient selection flow chart
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Khan MI, O'Leary C, O'Brien A, et al. Hospital acquired thrombosis (HAT) prevention in an acute hospital; a single centre cross-sectional study. Ir Med J. 2017;110(4):547. - PubMed
    1. Cohen AT, Tapson VF, Bergmann J, et al. Venous thromboembolism risk and prophylaxis in the acute hospital care setting (ENDORSE study): a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2008;371(9610):387–394. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60202-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fitzmaurice DA, Murray E. Thromboprophylaxis for adults in hospital. BMJ. 2007;334(7602):1017–1018. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39210.496505.BE. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mahan CE, Spyropoulos AC. Venous thromboembolism prevention: a systematic review of methods to improve prophylaxis and decrease events in the hospitalized patient. Hosp Pract. 2010;38(1):97–108. doi: 10.3810/hp.2010.02.284. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amin A, Neuman WR, Lingohr-Smith M, et al. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and risk in the inpatient and outpatient continuum of care among hospitalized acutely ill patients in the US: a retrospective analysis. Adv Ther. 2019;36(1):59–71. doi: 10.1007/s12325-018-0846-2. - DOI - PubMed