Publication trends in the field of the cornea in the last 4 decades: a bibliometric study
- PMID: 37074568
- DOI: 10.1007/s10792-023-02705-2
Publication trends in the field of the cornea in the last 4 decades: a bibliometric study
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this bibliometric study was to identify the top 100 most-cited articles on the cornea published in the English language between 1980 and 2021 using multidimensional citation analysis.
Methods: The data were obtained from the Thomson Reuters Web of Science Core Collection and the PubMed databases. The top 100 articles in terms of citation number were identified and analyzed.
Results: A total of 40,792 articles related to the cornea were retrieved. The 100 most-cited articles were published between 1995 and 2000. The average time since publication was 19.64 ± 5.75 years. The mean impact factor of the journals was 10.27 ± 17.14 and the Q category of most journals was Q1. Ophthalmology was the journal with the most published articles (n = 10), which represented level 3 evidence. The three most common topics among the top 100 articles were treatment modality, histopathology, and diagnostic imaging. The most frequently mentioned treatments were related to limbal stem cell failure, crosslinking, and lamellar keratoplasty. We observed a negative correlation between the average number of citations per year and the time passed since publication (r = - 0.629; p = 0.001).
Conclusion: Our analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles on the cornea revealed scientific contributions, vital current data related to clinical implementations, and valuable insights into the current developments in ophthalmology. To our knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate the most influential papers on the cornea, and our findings highlight the research quality and latest discoveries and trends in the management cornea diseases.
Keywords: Bibliometric; Citation; Cornea; Trend analysis.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
Similar articles
-
A Bibliometric Analysis of Top-Cited Journal Articles in Obstetrics and Gynecology.JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1918007. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18007. JAMA Netw Open. 2019. PMID: 31860106 Free PMC article.
-
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):85.e1-85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 4. J Pediatr Urol. 2015. PMID: 25819379
-
50 years in urinary incontinence: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited articles of the last 50 years.Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Apr;33(4):919-930. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05039-8. Epub 2022 Jan 3. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. PMID: 34977952
-
A Bibliometric Analysis of the Most Cited Articles in Neurocritical Care Research.Neurocrit Care. 2019 Oct;31(2):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00731-6. Neurocrit Care. 2019. PMID: 31087256 Review.
-
Top-cited Articles in Regenerative Endodontics: A Bibliometric Analysis.J Endod. 2018 Nov;44(11):1650-1664. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Sep 19. J Endod. 2018. PMID: 30243658 Review.
References
-
- Li Z, Jiang J, Chen K, Chen Q, Zheng Q, Liu X et al (2021) Preventing corneal blindness caused by keratitis using artificial intelligence. Nat Commun 12:3738. https://doi.org/10.1038/S41467-021-24116-6 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Antunes-Foschini R, Adriano L, de Andrade Batista Murashima A, Barbosa AP, Nominato LF, Dias LC et al (2021) Limitations and advances in new treatments and future perspectives of corneal blindness. Arq Bras Oftalmol 84:282–296. https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.20210042 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Björk BC (2011) A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals. J Med Internet Res 13:115. https://doi.org/10.2196/JMIR.1802 - DOI
-
- Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, Tatagari S, Esteves SC, Harlev A, Henkel R et al (2016) Bibliometrics: tracking research impact by selecting the appropriate metrics. Asian J Androl 18:296–309. https://doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.171582 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Aroeira RI, Castanho MARB (2020) Can citation metrics predict the true impact of scientific papers? FEBS J 287:2440–2448. https://doi.org/10.1111/FEBS.15255 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources