Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 19;20(4):e1004223.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004223. eCollection 2023 Apr.

The association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events by age and frailty: A cohort study

Affiliations

The association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events by age and frailty: A cohort study

James P Sheppard et al. PLoS Med. .

Abstract

Background: Antihypertensives are effective at reducing the risk of cardiovascular disease, but limited data exist quantifying their association with serious adverse events, particularly in older people with frailty. This study aimed to examine this association using nationally representative electronic health record data.

Methods and findings: This was a retrospective cohort study utilising linked data from 1,256 general practices across England held within the Clinical Practice Research Datalink between 1998 and 2018. Included patients were aged 40+ years, with a systolic blood pressure reading between 130 and 179 mm Hg, and not previously prescribed antihypertensive treatment. The main exposure was defined as a first prescription of antihypertensive treatment. The primary outcome was hospitalisation or death within 10 years from falls. Secondary outcomes were hypotension, syncope, fractures, acute kidney injury, electrolyte abnormalities, and primary care attendance with gout. The association between treatment and these serious adverse events was examined by Cox regression adjusted for propensity score. This propensity score was generated from a multivariable logistic regression model with patient characteristics, medical history and medication prescriptions as covariates, and new antihypertensive treatment as the outcome. Subgroup analyses were undertaken by age and frailty. Of 3,834,056 patients followed for a median of 7.1 years, 484,187 (12.6%) were prescribed new antihypertensive treatment in the 12 months before the index date (baseline). Antihypertensives were associated with an increased risk of hospitalisation or death from falls (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21 to 1.26), hypotension (aHR 1.32, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.35), syncope (aHR 1.20, 95% CI 1.17 to 1.22), acute kidney injury (aHR 1.44, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.47), electrolyte abnormalities (aHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.48), and primary care attendance with gout (aHR 1.35, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.37). The absolute risk of serious adverse events with treatment was very low, with 6 fall events per 10,000 patients treated per year. In older patients (80 to 89 years) and those with severe frailty, this absolute risk was increased, with 61 and 84 fall events per 10,000 patients treated per year (respectively). Findings were consistent in sensitivity analyses using different approaches to address confounding and taking into account the competing risk of death. A strength of this analysis is that it provides evidence regarding the association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events, in a population of patients more representative than those enrolled in previous randomised controlled trials. Although treatment effect estimates fell within the 95% CIs of those from such trials, these analyses were observational in nature and so bias from unmeasured confounding cannot be ruled out.

Conclusions: Antihypertensive treatment was associated with serious adverse events. Overall, the absolute risk of this harm was low, with the exception of older patients and those with moderate to severe frailty, where the risks were similar to the likelihood of benefit from treatment. In these populations, physicians may want to consider alternative approaches to management of blood pressure and refrain from prescribing new treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events leading to hospitalisation or death, based on analyses of electronic health records and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
Estimates from randomised controlled trials were derived from a previously published meta-analysis [9], and represent risk ratios rather than hazard ratios. For rare events such as the outcomes presented here, these would be expected to be equivalent. The total number of patients included in each analysis varies due exclusion of participants who experienced the outcome of interest on the index date, model convergence, and variation in the matching algorithm. CI, confidence interval; IPTW, inverse probability treatment weights.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events leading to hospitalisation or death, by age at the index date.
The total number of patients included in each analysis varies due to the exclusion of participants who experienced the outcome of interest on the index date. Models adjusted for propensity score. CI, confidence interval.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Association between antihypertensive treatment and serious adverse events leading to hospitalisation or death, by frailty status at the index date.
The total number of patients included in each analysis varies due to the exclusion of participants who experienced the outcome of interest on the index date. Models adjusted for propensity score. CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Ettehad D, Emdin CA, Kiran A, Anderson SG, Callender T, Emberson J, et al.. Blood pressure lowering for prevention of cardiovascular disease and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2016;387(10022):957–967. Epub 2016/01/03. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01225-8 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, Casey DE Jr., Collins KJ, Dennison Himmelfarb C, et al.. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Hypertension (Dallas, Tex: 1979). 2018;71(6):e13–e115. Epub 2017/11/15. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams B, Mancia G, Spiering W, Agabiti Rosei E, Azizi M, Burnier M, et al.. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(33):3021–3104. Epub 2018/08/31. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy339 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Weiss J, Freeman M, Low A, Fu R, Kerfoot A, Paynter R, et al.. Benefits and Harms of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(6):419–429. Epub 2017/01/24. doi: 10.7326/M16-1754 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Oscanoa TJ, Lizaraso F, Carvajal A. Hospital admissions due to adverse drug reactions in the elderly. A meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73(6):759–770. Epub 2017/03/03. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2225-3 . - DOI - PubMed

Publication types