Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 21;9(16):eadg6175.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg6175. Epub 2023 Apr 19.

Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss

Hedvig Skirgård  1   2   3   4 Hannah J Haynie  5 Damián E Blasi  1   6   7 Harald Hammarström  4   8 Jeremy Collins  4   9 Jay J Latarche  10 Jakob Lesage  1   4   11   12   13 Tobias Weber  1   14 Alena Witzlack-Makarevich  15 Sam Passmore  16   17   18 Angela Chira  1 Luke Maurits  19 Russell Dinnage  20 Michael Dunn  4   8 Ger Reesink  9 Ruth Singer  2   21 Claire Bowern  22 Patience Epps  23 Jane Hill  24 Outi Vesakoski  25   26 Martine Robbeets  27 Noor Karolin Abbas  10 Daniel Auer  1 Nancy A Bakker  1   14 Giulia Barbos  10 Robert D Borges  28 Swintha Danielsen  29   30   31 Luise Dorenbusch  1   32 Ella Dorn  10 John Elliott  33 Giada Falcone  8 Jana Fischer  1   14 Yustinus Ghanggo Ate  3   34 Hannah Gibson  35 Hans-Philipp Göbel  1   14   36 Jemima A Goodall  10 Victoria Gruner  1 Andrew Harvey  37 Rebekah Hayes  10 Leonard Heer  14 Roberto E Herrera Miranda  12   32   38   39 Nataliia Hübler  1   14 Biu Huntington-Rainey  10   40   41 Jessica K Ivani  42 Marilen Johns  1   14 Erika Just  42 Eri Kashima  2   3 Carolina Kipf  1   14 Janina V Klingenberg  1   14 Nikita König  14   43 Aikaterina Koti  8 Richard G A Kowalik  44 Olga Krasnoukhova  45   46 Nora L M Lindvall  8 Mandy Lorenzen  1   14 Hannah Lutzenberger  9   47 Tânia R A Martins  10 Celia Mata German  10 Suzanne van der Meer  4 Jaime Montoya Samamé  48 Michael Müller  1 Saliha Muradoglu  2 Kelsey Neely  23 Johanna Nickel  1   14 Miina Norvik  49   50 Cheryl Akinyi Oluoch  1   14 Jesse Peacock  4   9 India O C Pearey  10 Naomi Peck  2   51 Stephanie Petit  10 Sören Pieper  14 Mariana Poblete  48   52 Daniel Prestipino  2 Linda Raabe  1   14 Amna Raja  10 Janis Reimringer  1 Sydney C Rey  10   53 Julia Rizaew  10 Eloisa Ruppert  54 Kim K Salmon  1 Jill Sammet  1   14 Rhiannon Schembri  2   55 Lars Schlabbach  1   14 Frederick W P Schmidt  56 Amalia Skilton  57 Wikaliler Daniel Smith  23 Hilário de Sousa  4   58 Kristin Sverredal  8 Daniel Valle  59 Javier Vera  48 Judith Voß  1   14 Tim Witte  1   14 Henry Wu  2   60 Stephanie Yam  2   61 Jingting Ye  1   62 Maisie Yong  10 Tessa Yuditha  9   63 Roberto Zariquiey  1   48 Robert Forkel  1 Nicholas Evans  2   3 Stephen C Levinson  4 Martin Haspelmath  1 Simon J Greenhill  1   64 Quentin D Atkinson  64 Russell D Gray  1   64
Affiliations

Grambank reveals the importance of genealogical constraints on linguistic diversity and highlights the impact of language loss

Hedvig Skirgård et al. Sci Adv. .

Abstract

While global patterns of human genetic diversity are increasingly well characterized, the diversity of human languages remains less systematically described. Here, we outline the Grambank database. With over 400,000 data points and 2400 languages, Grambank is the largest comparative grammatical database available. The comprehensiveness of Grambank allows us to quantify the relative effects of genealogical inheritance and geographic proximity on the structural diversity of the world's languages, evaluate constraints on linguistic diversity, and identify the world's most unusual languages. An analysis of the consequences of language loss reveals that the reduction in diversity will be strikingly uneven across the major linguistic regions of the world. Without sustained efforts to document and revitalize endangered languages, our linguistic window into human history, cognition, and culture will be seriously fragmented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Variance explained by phylogeny and geography.
Each point is a Grambank feature. The panels represent different domains of grammar that the features are associated with: (A) clausal, (B) nominal domain, (C) pronominal domain, and (D) verbal domain. A high value indicates that a large part of the variance is explained by either space (y axis) or phylogeny (x axis). The ellipses represent the standard deviation of the joint posterior, tilted for the covariance.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Grammatical similarity in the Grambank sample of languages.
The color coding represents the distribution of languages according to the first three principal components (PCs) mapped onto RGB color space (PC1, red; PC2, green; PC3, blue). Similarity in color indicates similarity in grammatical structure on the first three dimensions. See fig. S15 for loading of Grambank features on the first two components and fig. S16 for correlation with theoretical metrics.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.. Distribution of the 12 largest families in our dataset in Grambank design space.
The x axis represents the first principal component (PC1), and the y axis represents the second principal component (PC2). All languages are plotted, and for each facet, one family is highlighted in a different color. Austronesian languages, which are known for lacking gender and having little morphology, are found on the far left.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.. Decline of functional richness associated with language loss.
Top: Bars representing functional richness relative to the current diversity of the world’s languages are shown in light green, and functional richness of nonthreatened languages in the same areas are shown in dark green. Functional richness declines in all areas, with some regions showing dramatic decreases. Bottom: Threatened (gray) and nonthreatened (black) languages are plotted over a convex hull (green) that represents the overall area of functional space [x and y, representing two dimensions of a principal coordinate analysis on the Grambank feature set] occupied by languages of the area.

References

    1. H. Hammarström, R. Forkel, M. Haspelmath, S. Bank, glottolog/glottolog: Glottolog Database 4.5 as CLDF (v4.5) [Data set] (Zenodo, 2021); 10.5281/zenodo.5772649. - DOI
    1. M. H. Christiansen, N. Chater,Language as shaped by the brain. Behav. Brain Sci. 31, 489–509 (2008). - PubMed
    1. B. Bickel, A. Witzlack-Makarevich, K. K. Choudhary, M. Schlesewsky, I. Bornkessel-Schlesewsky,The neurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar: Evidence from case marking. PLOS ONE 10, e0132819 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. J. Nichols, Linguistic Diversity in Space and Time (University of Chicago Press, 1992).
    1. P. Muysken, From Linguistic Areas to Areal Linguistics (John Benjamins, 2008).