Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Nov 22;28(6):418-423.
doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112185.

Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment

Affiliations

Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment

Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit et al. BMJ Evid Based Med. .

Abstract

This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group (RRMG). Rapid reviews (RRs) use modified systematic review (SR) methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods to ensure integrity. This paper addresses considerations around the acceleration of study selection, data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment in RRs. If a RR is being undertaken, review teams should consider using one or more of the following methodological shortcuts: screen a proportion (eg, 20%) of records dually at the title/abstract level until sufficient reviewer agreement is achieved, then proceed with single-reviewer screening; use the same approach for full-text screening; conduct single-data extraction only on the most relevant data points and conduct single-RoB assessment on the most important outcomes, with a second person verifying the data extraction and RoB assessment for completeness and correctness. Where available, extract data and RoB assessments from an existing SR that meets the eligibility criteria.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: IS and LP: None declared. BN-S, CH, DD and GG are co-convenors of the RRMG. MT worked 2022 as research associate for the RRMG. AN-S is leading the crowdsourcing project ‘Cochrane Crowd’.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Klerings I, Robalino S, Booth A, et al. . Rapid reviews methods series: guidance on literature search. BMJ Evid Based Med 2023;28:412–7. 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112079 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garritty C, Tricco AC, Smith M, et al. . Rapid reviews methods series: involving patient and public partners, healthcare providers and policymakers as knowledge users. BMJ Evid Based Med 2023. 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112070 [Epub ahead of print 19 April 2023]. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Devane D. Rapid reviews methods series: assessing the certainty of evidence in rapid reviews – a practical guide. BMJ Evid Based Med 2023. 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112111 [Epub ahead of print 19 April 2023]. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nussbaumer-Streit B, Ellen M, Klerings I, et al. . Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review. J Clin Epidemiol 2021;139:287–96. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.019 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. . AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 2017;358:j4008. 10.1136/bmj.j4008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed