Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment
- PMID: 37076266
- PMCID: PMC10715469
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112185
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on team considerations, study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment
Abstract
This paper is part of a series of methodological guidance from the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group (RRMG). Rapid reviews (RRs) use modified systematic review (SR) methods to accelerate the review process while maintaining systematic, transparent and reproducible methods to ensure integrity. This paper addresses considerations around the acceleration of study selection, data extraction and risk of bias (RoB) assessment in RRs. If a RR is being undertaken, review teams should consider using one or more of the following methodological shortcuts: screen a proportion (eg, 20%) of records dually at the title/abstract level until sufficient reviewer agreement is achieved, then proceed with single-reviewer screening; use the same approach for full-text screening; conduct single-data extraction only on the most relevant data points and conduct single-RoB assessment on the most important outcomes, with a second person verifying the data extraction and RoB assessment for completeness and correctness. Where available, extract data and RoB assessments from an existing SR that meets the eligibility criteria.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: IS and LP: None declared. BN-S, CH, DD and GG are co-convenors of the RRMG. MT worked 2022 as research associate for the RRMG. AN-S is leading the crowdsourcing project ‘Cochrane Crowd’.
Similar articles
-
What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studies.Res Synth Methods. 2024 Jan;15(1):2-20. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1664. Epub 2023 Sep 11. Res Synth Methods. 2024. PMID: 37696668
-
Evaluation of the interim Cochrane rapid review methods guidance-A mixed-methods study on the understanding of and adherence to the guidance.Res Synth Methods. 2023 Nov;14(6):824-846. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1656. Epub 2023 Jul 21. Res Synth Methods. 2023. PMID: 37483013
-
Rapid reviews methods series: Guidance on assessing the certainty of evidence.BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jan 19;29(1):50-54. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112111. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024. PMID: 37076264 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid review methods series: Guidance on the use of supportive software.BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 Jul 23;29(4):264-271. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112530. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024. PMID: 38242566 Free PMC article.
-
A retrospective comparison of systematic reviews with same-topic rapid reviews.J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;96:23-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.12.001. Epub 2017 Dec 16. J Clin Epidemiol. 2018. PMID: 29258906 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing the properties of traditional and novel approaches to the modified Rankin scale: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Stroke J. 2025 Jun;10(2):362-370. doi: 10.1177/23969873241293569. Epub 2024 Oct 30. Eur Stroke J. 2025. PMID: 39474736 Free PMC article.
-
Rapid review method series: interim guidance for the reporting of rapid reviews.BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Mar 21;30(2):118-123. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-112899. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025. PMID: 39038926 Free PMC article.
-
Training and education provided to local change champions within implementation trials: a rapid systematic review.Implement Sci. 2025 Feb 5;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01416-9. Implement Sci. 2025. PMID: 39910625 Free PMC article.
-
A Rapid Systematic Review Assessing the Effectiveness of Interventions to Promote Self-Management in Workers with Long-Term Health Conditions and Disabilities.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 23;21(12):1714. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121714. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39767553 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical restraint in inpatient psychiatric settings: A systematic review of international prevalence, associations, outcomes, and reduction strategies.Eur Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25;68(1):e57. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2025.2453. Eur Psychiatry. 2025. PMID: 40275614 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials