The expanding role of RNA modifications in plant RNA polymerase II transcripts: highlights and perspectives
- PMID: 37076273
- PMCID: PMC10400116
- DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erad136
The expanding role of RNA modifications in plant RNA polymerase II transcripts: highlights and perspectives
Abstract
Regulation of gene expression is a complicated process based on the coordination of many different pathways, including epigenetic control of chromatin state, transcription, RNA processing, export of mature transcripts to the cytoplasm, and their translation into proteins. In recent years, with the development of high-throughput sequencing techniques, the importance of RNA modifications in gene expression has added another layer to this regulatory landscape. To date, >150 different types of RNA modifications have been found. Most RNA modifications, such as N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and pseudouridine (Ψ), were initially identified in highly abundant structural RNAs, such as rRNAs, tRNAs, and small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs). Current methods provide the opportunity to identify new types of modifications and to precisely localize them not only in highly expressed RNAs but also in mRNA and small RNA molecules. The presence of modified nucleotides in protein-coding transcripts can affect their stability, localization, and further steps of pre-mRNA maturation. Finally, it may affect the quality and quantity of protein synthesis. In plants, the epitranscriptomic field is still narrow, but the number of reports is growing rapidly. This review presents highlights and perspectives of plant epitranscriptomic modifications, focusing on various aspects of modifications of RNA polymerase II transcripts and their influence on RNA fate.
Keywords: N 1-methyladenosine; N 6-methyladenosine; 5-methylcytosine; Epitranscriptomics; NAD+ capping; RNA methylation; RNA modifications.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflict of interest declared.
Figures

Similar articles
-
The impact of epitranscriptomic marks on post-transcriptional regulation in plants.Brief Funct Genomics. 2021 Mar 27;20(2):113-124. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elaa021. Brief Funct Genomics. 2021. PMID: 33274735 Review.
-
Deciphering the Epitranscriptomic Signatures in Cell Fate Determination and Development.Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2019 Aug;15(4):474-496. doi: 10.1007/s12015-019-09894-3. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2019. PMID: 31123982 Review.
-
The Repertoire of RNA Modifications Orchestrates a Plethora of Cellular Responses.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jan 25;24(3):2387. doi: 10.3390/ijms24032387. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36768716 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Epitranscriptomics as a New Layer of Regulation of Gene Expression in Skeletal Muscle: Known Functions and Future Perspectives.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Oct 13;24(20):15161. doi: 10.3390/ijms242015161. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37894843 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Functional interplay within the epitranscriptome: Reality or fiction?Bioessays. 2022 Feb;44(2):e2100174. doi: 10.1002/bies.202100174. Epub 2021 Dec 6. Bioessays. 2022. PMID: 34873719 Review.
Cited by
-
RNA signaling in medicinal plants: An overlooked mechanism for phytochemical regulation.Biochem Biophys Rep. 2025 Apr 29;42:102032. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2025.102032. eCollection 2025 Jun. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2025. PMID: 40342531 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Anderson SJ, Kramer MC, Gosai SJ, et al. . 2018. N6-methyladenosine inhibits local ribonucleolytic cleavage to stabilize mRNAs in Arabidopsis. Cell Reports 25, 1146–1157. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources