Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials
- PMID: 37076411
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.227
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials
Abstract
Objective: Assessment of minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is scarce and limited to non-randomized studies. This study aimed to compare oncological and surgical outcomes after MIPD compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) for patients after resectable PDAC from published randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
Methods: A systematic review was performed to identify RCTs comparing MIPD and OPD including PDAC (Jan 2015-July 2021). Individual data of patients with PDAC were requested. Primary outcomes were R0 rate and lymph node yield. Secondary outcomes were blood-loss, operation time, major complications, hospital stay and 90-day mortality.
Results: Overall, 4 RCTs (all addressed laparoscopic MIPD) with 275 patients with PDAC were included. In total, 128 patients underwent laparoscopic MIPD and 147 patients underwent OPD. The R0 rate (risk difference(RD) -1%, P = 0.740) and lymph node yield (mean difference(MD) +1.55, P = 0.305) were comparable between laparoscopic MIPD and OPD. Laparoscopic MIPD was associated with less perioperative blood-loss (MD -91ml, P = 0.026), shorter length of hospital stay (MD -3.8 days, P = 0.044), while operation time was longer (MD +98.5 min, P = 0.003). Major complications (RD -11%, P = 0.302) and 90-day mortality (RD -2%, P = 0.328) were comparable between laparoscopic MIPD and OPD.
Conclusions: This individual patient data meta-analysis of MIPD versus OPD in patients with resectable PDAC suggests that laparoscopic MIPD is non-inferior regarding radicality, lymph node yield, major complications and 90-day mortality and is associated with less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and longer operation time. The impact on long-term survival and recurrence should be studied in RCTs including robotic MIPD.
Keywords: HPB surgery; Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Open pancreatoduodenectomy; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Pancreatoduodenectomy.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest statement All authors declare there are no conflicts of interests.
Similar articles
-
The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Aug 15;408(1):311. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03047-4. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023. PMID: 37581763 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery.BMC Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov 23;17(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12876-017-0691-9. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017. PMID: 29169337 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Pancreatic Fistula After Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy.JAMA Surg. 2025 Feb 1;160(2):190-198. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.5412. JAMA Surg. 2025. PMID: 39630441
-
Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD011391. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011391.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27043078 Free PMC article.
-
Minimally invasive surgical approach versus open procedure for pancreaticoduodenectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Dec;96(50):e8619. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008619. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017. PMID: 29390259 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Standard operating procedures and learning curve analysis for surgical assistants in robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy.J Robot Surg. 2025 Jul 12;19(1):381. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02574-0. J Robot Surg. 2025. PMID: 40650697
-
Efficacy of Chen's pancreaticojejunostomy for patients with soft pancreatic texture and small main pancreatic duct in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.BMC Surg. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02984-9. BMC Surg. 2025. PMID: 40483427 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy provides better short-term outcomes as compared to its laparoscopic counterpart: a meta-analysis.Front Oncol. 2025 Jun 18;15:1568957. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1568957. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40606993 Free PMC article.
-
Extended pancreatic neck transection versus conventional pancreatic neck transection during laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPDEXCEPT): protocol for a multicentre superiority randomised controlled trial.BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 10;14(1):e078092. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078092. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38199635 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Periampullary Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024 Sep;55(3):1058-1068. doi: 10.1007/s12029-024-01091-x. Epub 2024 Jul 19. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2024. PMID: 39028397
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous