Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 19;14(1):2242.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37375-2.

Native qudit entanglement in a trapped ion quantum processor

Affiliations

Native qudit entanglement in a trapped ion quantum processor

Pavel Hrmo et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Quantum information carriers, just like most physical systems, naturally occupy high-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Instead of restricting them to a two-level subspace, these high-dimensional (qudit) quantum systems are emerging as a powerful resource for the next generation of quantum processors. Yet harnessing the potential of these systems requires efficient ways of generating the desired interaction between them. Here, we experimentally demonstrate an implementation of a native two-qudit entangling gate up to dimension 5 in a trapped-ion system. This is achieved by generalizing a recently proposed light-shift gate mechanism to generate genuine qudit entanglement in a single application of the gate. The gate seamlessly adapts to the local dimension of the system with a calibration overhead that is independent of the dimension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

T.M. & R.B. are associated with Alpine Quantum Technologies, a commercially oriented quantum computing company. The remaining authors declare no other competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Level scheme of the 40Ca+ ion.
Encoding quantum information in the sub-levels of the S1/2 and D5/2 manifold allows us to increase the size of the computational Hilbert space. Coherent operations between the sub-levels can be performed using 729 nm laser light, while 401 nm light is used to generate the light shift for the state-dependent force.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Experimental setup.
Two beams with λ = 401 nm and frequencies f1,  f2 with a relative detuning of ωCOM + δ are intersected at a 90 angle to drive the state-dependent force. A 729 nm laser along the axial trap direction is used to implement local operations.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Application of the gate on two qutrits.
a Phase evolution of the two-qutrit state components relative to the 00 ground state during the application of the LS gate pulses. States 01 and 10 are shown in orange, 02 and 20 in blue, and 21 and 12 in green. The equal electronic states 00,11,22 in purple do not acquire any relative phases. b Corresponding pulse scheme to implement the composite qudit light-shift gate operator G(θ) for a qutrit (d = 3). Light-shift gate pulses ULS(tg) are interlaced with cyclic permutation gates X3.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Fidelity decay measured using multiple gates.
a Schematic of the measurement sequence. Two ions initialized in 00 are rotated into an equal superposition of all states by applying the operator P with the 729 nm laser. After applying the gate operator G(θ) a variable number of times n a reversed preparation pulse P is applied. The populations of the resulting state are measured by a set of transfer pulses T0j, which are resonant π pulses between 0j to transfer the state j to the S1/2 manifold, allowing us to distinguish the qudit states. An analysis pulse A0,ϕj consisting of a resonant π/2 pulse between 0j with variable phase ϕ is used to measure the coherence between the 0 and j levels. Combined with the transfer pulses, all pairwise coherences can be measured. b A plot of qudit gate fidelity as a function of dimension. The average gate fidelities, shown as red circles, are extracted from fits to the fidelity decay when applying multiple gates G(θ) between P and P. The error bars correspond to 1 standard deviation in the fit parameters. A quadratic curve has been fitted to the data to highlight the empirically observed scaling of the fidelity with dimension. The simulated fidelities from a detailed noise model are shown as blue diamonds, see supplementary note 2 for details.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Generation of genuine qudit entanglement.
The measured state fidelity for d = 2, 3, 4, 5 is shown as blue data points and the corresponding concurrence as orange squares. The ideal values for maximally entangled states (the experimental target states) are shown as dashed (dotted) lines. The gray shaded bars represent the lower bound on the fidelity (blue data points) for certifying maximal Schmidt number entanglement, while the gray horizontal lines indicate the concurrence Cd for a maximally entangled state in dimension d. Error bars correspond to one standard deviation of experimental shot noise.

References

    1. Saffman M. Quantum computing with neutral atoms. Natl Sci. Rev. 2019;6:24. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwy088. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Huang H-L, Wu D, Fan D, Zhu X. Superconducting quantum computing: a review. Sci. China Inform. Sci. 2020;63:180501. doi: 10.1007/s11432-020-2881-9. - DOI
    1. Bruzewicz CD, Chiaverini J, McConnell R, Sage JM. Trapped-ion quantum computing: Progress and challenges. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2019;6:021314. doi: 10.1063/1.5088164. - DOI
    1. Slussarenko S, Pryde GJ. Photonic quantum information processing: a concise review. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2019;6:041303. doi: 10.1063/1.5115814. - DOI
    1. Chi Y, et al. A programmable qudit-based quantum processor. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:1166. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28767-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed