The outcome of surgical management for the patient with giant occipital encephalocele: a case illustration and systematic review

Abstract

Purpose: Occipital encephalocele (OE) is one of congenital malformation of the central nervous system. However, giant OE, mostly defines as bigger-than-head OE, is extremely rare and carries a worse prognosis. Here, we presented our systematic review of the management of the giant OE and illustrated our case.

Method: The systematic review was carried out under PRISMA guidelines. Publications were searched under "occipital encephalocele" from 1959 to April 2021. Our primary area of interest was the outcome of patients who have undergone surgery for giant OE. Variables of interest included age, sex, size of the sac, presentations, associated anomalies, management, outcome, and follow-up period were collected.

Result: We collected 35 articles, consisting of 74 cases (including 1 case from our illustrative case), to perform a systematic review. The mean age at the time of surgery was 3.53 ± 8.22 months. The mean circumference of the sac was 52.41 ± 18.6 cm. The three most common associated anomalies were microcephaly, corpus callosal agenesis/dysgenesis, and Chiari malformation. After the surgery, survival was reported in 64 (90.1%) patients. Postoperative complications were reported in 14 cases (16 events). Age above 1 month at the time of surgery was significantly associated with survival (p = 0.02) but not with complication (p = 0.22). In contrast, the type of surgery was not associated with survival (p = 0.18) or complications (p = 0.41).

Conclusion: Despite a rare condition with a poor prognosis, our reported case and systematic review revealed promising outcomes of surgery regardless of surgical strategies, especially in patients older than 1 month. Thus, appropriate planning is essential for the treatment of this condition.

Keywords: Congenital anomaly; Meningoencephalocele; Surgery; Survival.